Cited by 288Social and Intergroup PsychologySocial Power and Status DynamicsSocial and Cultural Dynamics

Signs of Social Class: The Experience of Economic Inequality in Everyday Life

Open access
Kraus, Michael W., Park, Jun Won, Tan, Jacinth J. X.·2017·Perspectives on Psychological Science

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

By some accounts, global economic inequality is at its highest point on record. The pernicious effects of this broad societal trend are striking: Rising inequality is linked to poorer health and well-being across countries, continents, and cultures. The economic and psychological forces that perpetuate inequality continue to be studied, and in this theoretical review, we examine the role of daily experiences of economic inequality-the communication of social class signals between interaction partners-in this process. We theorize that social class signals activate social comparison processes that strengthen group boundaries between the haves and have nots in society. In particular, we argue that class signals are a frequent, rapid, and accurate component of person perception, and we provide new data and analyses demonstrating the accuracy of class signaling in 60-s interactions, Facebook photographs, and isolated recordings of brief speech. We suggest that barriers to the reduction of economic inequality in society arise directly from this class signaling process through the augmentation of class boundaries and the elicitation of beliefs and behaviors that favor the economic status quo.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1745691616673192

Cites

126 of 126 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Kraus, Park, and Tan found that when Americans were asked to judge a speaker's social class from just seven spoken words, the accuracy of their judgments was above chance.

    “Kraus, Park, and Tan (2017) found that when Americans were asked to judge a speaker's social class from just seven spoken words, the accuracy of their judgments was again above chance”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Becker J. Kraus M. W. Rheinschmidt-Same M. L. (2017). Cultural expressions of social class and their implications for beliefs and behavior. Journal of Social Issues.
  2. Bjornsdottir R. T. Rule N. O. (2016, 1). Conspicuous class: Wealth is accurately perceived from the face. Presentation at the Emerging Psychology of Social Class Pre-Conference of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, San Diego, CA.
  3. Lareau A. Conley D. (Eds.). (2008). Social class: How does it work? New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kraus, M. W., Park, J. W., & Tan, J. J. X.
Affiliations
  • Yale University (US)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
Corresponding author
Kraus, Michael W.
Venue
Perspectives on Psychological Science
Published
2017-05
Volume
12
Issue
3
Pages
422-435
ISSN
  • 1745-6916 (ISSN-L)
  • 1745-6924
OpenAlex
W2618394217
Cited by
288
References
126
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 40 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 49 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 7
FWCI
56.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Perspectives on Psychological Science (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Singapore Management University Institutional Knowledge (InK) (Singapore Management University) (submittedVersion)
  • OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
  • PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
  • PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
Funders
Yale University, School of Management
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Power and Status Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Cultural Dynamics
Keywords
economic inequality, social comparison, person perception, class boundaries, everyday life, speech recordings, group boundaries
MeSH terms
Humans, Quality of Life, Social Class, Socioeconomic Factors, Health Status Disparities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review