Cited by 433Populism, Right-Wing MovementsPolitical Theory and DemocracyPolitical Conflict and Governance

Political Theory of Populism

Urbinati, Nadia·2019·Annual Review of Political Science

Abstract

Populism is the name of a global phenomenon whose definitional precariousness is proverbial. It resists generalizations and makes scholars of politics comparativist by necessity, as its language and content are imbued with the political culture of the society in which it arises. A rich body of socio-historical analyses allows us to situate populism within the global phenomenon called democracy, as its ideological core is nourished by the two main entities—the nation and the people—that have fleshed out popular sovereignty in the age of democratization. Populism consists in a transmutation of the democratic principles of the majority and the people in a way that is meant to celebrate one subset of the people as opposed to another, through a leader embodying it and an audience legitimizing it. This may make populism collide with constitutional democracy, even if its main tenets are embedded in the democratic universe of meanings and language. In this article, I illustrate the context-based character of populism and how its cyclical appearances reflect the forms of representative government. I review the main contemporary interpretations of the concept and argue that some basic agreement now exists on populism's rhetorical character and its strategy for achieving power in democratic societies. Finally, I sketch the main characteristics of populism in power and explain how it tends to transform the fundamentals of democracy: the people and the majority, elections, and representation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev-polisci-050317-070753

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Populist governments under charismatic one-person leadership can become dangerous for democracy when the connection between leader and people remains unmediated for a longer time, bypassing mediating institutions including the bureaucracy.

    “It is argued that populist governments -in particular under what is called the charismatic, one person leadership -can become dangerous for democracy when the connection between leader and people remains unmediated for a longer time, thus bypassing and surpassing mediating institutions to which one can also count, implicitly at least, the bureaucracy (Mansbridge & Macedo, 2019;Urbinati, 2019).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Urbinati, N.
Affiliations
Columbia University (US)
Corresponding author
Urbinati, Nadia
Venue
Annual Review of Political Science
Published
2019-05-11
Volume
22
Issue
1
Pages
111-127
ISSN
  • 1094-2939 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-1577
OpenAlex
W2902435142
Cited by
433
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 44 · 2025: 102 · 2024: 93 · 2023: 65 · 2022: 50 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 17
FWCI
28.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Annual Review of Political Science (publishedVersion)
Funders
Brown University
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Populism, Right-Wing Movements
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Theory and Democracy
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Conflict and Governance
Keywords
populism, political theory of populism, popular sovereignty, democracy, nation and people, populist rhetoric, representative government, democratization, elections, political culture, constitutional democracy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review