Political Theory of Populism
Abstract
Populism is the name of a global phenomenon whose definitional precariousness is proverbial. It resists generalizations and makes scholars of politics comparativist by necessity, as its language and content are imbued with the political culture of the society in which it arises. A rich body of socio-historical analyses allows us to situate populism within the global phenomenon called democracy, as its ideological core is nourished by the two main entities—the nation and the people—that have fleshed out popular sovereignty in the age of democratization. Populism consists in a transmutation of the democratic principles of the majority and the people in a way that is meant to celebrate one subset of the people as opposed to another, through a leader embodying it and an audience legitimizing it. This may make populism collide with constitutional democracy, even if its main tenets are embedded in the democratic universe of meanings and language. In this article, I illustrate the context-based character of populism and how its cyclical appearances reflect the forms of representative government. I review the main contemporary interpretations of the concept and argue that some basic agreement now exists on populism's rhetorical character and its strategy for achieving power in democratic societies. Finally, I sketch the main characteristics of populism in power and explain how it tends to transform the fundamentals of democracy: the people and the majority, elections, and representation.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Populist governments under charismatic one-person leadership can become dangerous for democracy when the connection between leader and people remains unmediated for a longer time, bypassing mediating institutions including the bureaucracy.
“It is argued that populist governments -in particular under what is called the charismatic, one person leadership -can become dangerous for democracy when the connection between leader and people remains unmediated for a longer time, thus bypassing and surpassing mediating institutions to which one can also count, implicitly at least, the bureaucracy (Mansbridge & Macedo, 2019;Urbinati, 2019).”
From Public Administration Under Populist Rule: Standing Up Against Democratic Backsliding (2024) · cites this paper as Urbinati, 2019
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Populism and Democratic Theory
Mansbridge, J., & Macedo, S. (2019) · Annual Review of Law and Social Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-101518-042843 · Cited by 185 · see citing works
Public Administration Under Populist Rule: Standing Up Against Democratic Backsliding
Bauer, M. W. (2024) · International Journal of Public Administration · doi:10.1080/01900692.2023.2243400 · Cited by 104 · see citing works
“…populism as “the democratic element of contemporary representative systems” (Laclau, 2005, p. 176), but there is consensus that despite its “definitional precariousness” (Urbinati, 2019, p. 114) populism cannot outrightly be reprimanded as non-democratic (Mudde & Rovira Kaltwasser, 2017, p. 10).”
InfluentialSocial perception of systemic risks
Schweizer, P., Goble, R., & Renn, O. (2022) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/risa.13831 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Palacios Brihuega, I., Garrido Rubia, A., & Martínez Rodríguez, A. (2025) · Revista Internacional de Sociología · doi:10.3989/ris.2024.82.4.1304 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
- Authors
- Urbinati, N.
- Affiliations
- Columbia University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Urbinati, Nadia
- ORCID
- Urbinati, Nadia
- Venue
- Annual Review of Political Science
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 2019-05-11
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 111-127
- ISSN
- 1094-2939 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-1577
- OpenAlex
- W2902435142
- Cited by
- 433
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 44 · 2025: 102 · 2024: 93 · 2023: 65 · 2022: 50 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 17
- FWCI
- 28.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Annual Review of Political Science (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Brown University
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Populism, Right-Wing Movements
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Theory and Democracy
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Conflict and Governance
- Keywords
- populism, political theory of populism, popular sovereignty, democracy, nation and people, populist rhetoric, representative government, democratization, elections, political culture, constitutional democracy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review