The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Detecting Consciousness: A Unique Role for Neuroimaging
Abstract
How can we ever know, unequivocally, that another person is conscious and aware? Putting aside deeper philosophical considerations about the nature of consciousness itself, historically, the only reliable method for detecting awareness in others has been through a predicted behavioral response to an external prompt or command. The answer may take the form of spoken words or a nonverbal signal such as a hand movement or the blink of an eye, but it is this answer, and only this answer, that allows us to infer awareness. In recent years, rapid technological developments in the field of neuroimaging have provided new methods for revealing thoughts, actions, and intentions based solely on the pattern of activity that is observed in the brain. In specialized centers, these methods are now being employed routinely to detect consciousness in behaviorally nonresponsive patients when all existing clinical techniques have failed to provide that information. In this review, I compare those circumstances in which neuroimaging data can be used to infer consciousness in the absence of a behavioral response with those circumstances in which it cannot. This distinction is fundamental for understanding and interpreting patterns of brain activity following acute brain injury and has profound implications for clinical care, diagnosis, prognosis, and medical-legal decision-making (relating to the prolongation, or otherwise, of life after severe brain injury). It also sheds light on more basic scientific questions about the nature of consciousness and the neural representation of our own thoughts and intentions.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The specific composition of tubulin has also lent strength to quantum models of neural processing due to the fact that it is partially composed of chromophores such as tryptophan, arranged in a manner similar to photosynthetic systems in plants and bacteria 43,44 , which have been surmised to support coherent quantum effects.”
From Quantum effects in the brain: A review (2020) · cites this paper as [43]
In the citing paper
“Building on research that tryptophan rings arranged favourably in tubulin proteins can act as quantum channels supporting coherent electron dynamics in a manner similar to photosynthesis 43,80,81 , Craddock et al. argue that anaesthetic gas molecules binding in these channels inhibit quantum effects and disrupt coherent energy transfer and that this is responsible for the effects of general anaest”
From Quantum effects in the brain: A review (2020) · cites this paper as [43]
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 90 · Cited by 122
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- Adapa R. 2011. Exploring neural correlates of higher cognition with sedation. PhD thesis. Univ. Cambridge, UK
- Greenberg DL, 2007, Science, 313, 1402
- Haida M, 2000, The Frontier of Mind-Brain Science and Its Practical Applications II, 95
- Owen AM, 2005, Prog. Brain Res., 150, 461
- Roy. Coll. Phys. Work. Group, 1996, J. Roy. Coll. Phys. Lond., 30, 119
- Roy. Coll. Phys., 1998, A Code of Practice for the Diagnosis of Brainstem Death.
- Schacter DL, 1994, Memory Systems, 233
Metadata
- Authors
- Owen, A. M.
- Affiliations
- Western University (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Owen, Adrian M.
- ORCID
- Owen, Adrian M.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Psychology
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 2013-01-03
- Volume
- 64
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 109-133
- ISSN
- 0066-4308 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-2085
- OpenAlex
- W2131571019
- Cited by
- 122
- References
- 90
- Citations by year
- 2025: 10 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 11
- FWCI
- 1.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Annual Review of Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Free Will and Agency
- Keywords
- consciousness, neuroimaging, brain-computer interface, behavioral responses, vegetative state, minimally conscious state, acute brain injury
- MeSH terms
- Awareness, Brain, Brain Injuries, Brain Mapping, Consciousness, Consciousness Disorders, Electroencephalography, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Positron-Emission Tomography, Neuroimaging
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review