Cited by 122Traumatic Brain Injury ResearchPhilosophy and Theoretical ScienceFree Will and Agency

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Detecting Consciousness: A Unique Role for Neuroimaging

Owen, Adrian M.·2013·Annual Review of Psychology

Abstract

How can we ever know, unequivocally, that another person is conscious and aware? Putting aside deeper philosophical considerations about the nature of consciousness itself, historically, the only reliable method for detecting awareness in others has been through a predicted behavioral response to an external prompt or command. The answer may take the form of spoken words or a nonverbal signal such as a hand movement or the blink of an eye, but it is this answer, and only this answer, that allows us to infer awareness. In recent years, rapid technological developments in the field of neuroimaging have provided new methods for revealing thoughts, actions, and intentions based solely on the pattern of activity that is observed in the brain. In specialized centers, these methods are now being employed routinely to detect consciousness in behaviorally nonresponsive patients when all existing clinical techniques have failed to provide that information. In this review, I compare those circumstances in which neuroimaging data can be used to infer consciousness in the absence of a behavioral response with those circumstances in which it cannot. This distinction is fundamental for understanding and interpreting patterns of brain activity following acute brain injury and has profound implications for clinical care, diagnosis, prognosis, and medical-legal decision-making (relating to the prolongation, or otherwise, of life after severe brain injury). It also sheds light on more basic scientific questions about the nature of consciousness and the neural representation of our own thoughts and intentions.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143729

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 90 · Cited by 122

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Adapa R. 2011. Exploring neural correlates of higher cognition with sedation. PhD thesis. Univ. Cambridge, UK
  2. Greenberg DL, 2007, Science, 313, 1402
  3. Haida M, 2000, The Frontier of Mind-Brain Science and Its Practical Applications II, 95
  4. Owen AM, 2005, Prog. Brain Res., 150, 461
  5. Roy. Coll. Phys. Work. Group, 1996, J. Roy. Coll. Phys. Lond., 30, 119
  6. Roy. Coll. Phys., 1998, A Code of Practice for the Diagnosis of Brainstem Death.
  7. Schacter DL, 1994, Memory Systems, 233

Metadata

Authors
Owen, A. M.
Affiliations
Western University (CA)
Corresponding author
Owen, Adrian M.
Venue
Annual Review of Psychology
Published
2013-01-03
Volume
64
Issue
1
Pages
109-133
ISSN
  • 0066-4308 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-2085
OpenAlex
W2131571019
Cited by
122
References
90
Citations by year
2025: 10 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 11
FWCI
1.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annual Review of Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Free Will and Agency
Keywords
consciousness, neuroimaging, brain-computer interface, behavioral responses, vegetative state, minimally conscious state, acute brain injury
MeSH terms
Awareness, Brain, Brain Injuries, Brain Mapping, Consciousness, Consciousness Disorders, Electroencephalography, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Positron-Emission Tomography, Neuroimaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review