The Emotion Process: Event Appraisal and Component Differentiation
Open accessAbstract
Much emotion research has focused on the end result of the emotion process, categorical emotions, as reported by the protagonist or diagnosed by the researcher, with the aim of differentiating these discrete states. In contrast, this review concentrates on the emotion process itself by examining how ( a) elicitation, or the appraisal of events, leads to ( b) differentiation, in particular, action tendencies accompanied by physiological responses and manifested in facial, vocal, and gestural expressions, before ( c) conscious representation or experience of these changes (feeling) and ( d) categorizing and labeling these changes according to the semantic profiles of emotion words. The review focuses on empirical, particularly experimental, studies from emotion research and neighboring domains that contribute to a better understanding of the unfolding emotion process and the underlying mechanisms, including the interactions among emotion components.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Autonomic nervous system activity in emotion: a review
Kreibig, S. D. (2010) · Biological Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2010.03.010 · Cited by 3,188 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Kreibig (2010) reviewed 134 articles on autonomic nervous system (ANS) reactions to different emotions.”
BackgroundGaab, J., Rohleder, N., Nater, U. M., & Ehlert, U. (2005) · Psychoneuroendocrinology · doi:10.1016/j.psyneuen.2005.02.001 · Cited by 525 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Zacher, H., & Rudolph, C. W. (2021) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/amp0000702 · Cited by 643 · see citing works
Yu, H., Chen, J., Dardaine, B., & Yang, F. (2023) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2023.105476 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
- Authors
- Scherer, K. R., & Moors, A.
- Affiliations
- University of Geneva (CH)
- Venue
- Annual Review of Psychology
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 2019-01-04
- Volume
- 70
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 719-745
- ISSN
- 0066-4308 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-2085
- OpenAlex
- W2804575779
- Cited by
- 688
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 129 · 2025: 112 · 2024: 81 · 2023: 163 · 2022: 68 · 2021: 64 · 2020: 51 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 5.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Annual Review of Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion)
- Lirias (KU Leuven) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (G073317N)
- KU Leuven (C14/17/047)
- Vlaamse regering
- FP7 Ideas: European Research Council (230331)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotions and Moral Behavior
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Keywords
- emotion induction, action tendencies, physiological responses, facial expressions, vocal expression, gestural expression, feelings, emotion classification, emotional words, semantic profiles, emotion components
- MeSH terms
- Autonomic Nervous System, Emotions, Facial Expression, Humans, Motivation, Social Behavior
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review