Cited by 528Stress Responses and CortisolHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlAdrenal Hormones and Disorders

Psychological determinants of the cortisol stress response: the role of anticipatory cognitive appraisal

Gaab, J., Rohleder, N., Nater, U.M., Ehlert, U.·2005·Psychoneuroendocrinology

Abstract

Psychosocial stress is a potent activator of the hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis. While the physiological mechanisms of HPA axis responses to stress as well as its short and long-term consequences have been extensively examined, less is known why someone elicits an acute neuroendocrine stress response, i.e. what are the psychological processes involved and how are they related to the acute neuroendocrine stress response. To examine this question, a questionnaire to assess anticipatory cognitive appraisal processes was developed and administered to 81 male healthy subjects in a standardized psychosocial stress situation (Trier social stress test). Cortisol stress responses were assessed with repeated measurement of salivary free cortisol. Hierarchical regression analyses show that anticipatory cognitive appraisal, in contrast to general personality factors and retrospective stress appraisal is an important determinant of the cortisol stress response, explaining up to 35% of the variance of the salivary cortisol response. The reported results emphasize the importance of psychological stress processing for the understanding of psychobiological stress responses. Since stress and its biological consequences have been shown to be associated with the onset and the maintenance of somatic illnesses and psychiatric disorders, psychological processes are prime targets for prevention and intervention.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2005.02.001

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gaab, J., Rohleder, N., Nater, U. M., & Ehlert, U.
Affiliations
  • University of Zurich (CH)
  • Technische Universität Dresden (DE)
Corresponding author
Gaab, J.
Venue
Psychoneuroendocrinology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-07
Volume
30
Issue
6
Pages
599-610
ISSN
0306-4530 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2127489014
Cited by
525
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 31 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 26
FWCI
7.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychoneuroendocrinology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Foundation for Research in Science and the Humanities
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Adrenal Hormones and Disorders
Keywords
cortisol stress response, psychosocial stress, hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, salivary cortisol, Trier Social Stress Test, stress appraisal, personality factors, neuroendocrine stress response
MeSH terms
Adult, Cognition, Humans, Hydrocortisone, Hypothalamo-Hypophyseal System, Male, Neurosecretory Systems, Personality, Pituitary-Adrenal System, Regression Analysis, Saliva, Stress, Psychological, Comprehension

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review