Cited by 67Retinal Development and DisordersVirus-based gene therapy researchRNA Interference and Gene Delivery

Vectors and Gene Delivery to the Retina

Open access
Planul, Arthur, Dalkara, Deniz·2017·Annual Review of Vision Science

Abstract

One of the great advantages of the retina as a target tissue for gene delivery is the wide array of genetic tools that have been developed in the past decade. This includes a variety of vectors for therapeutic gene delivery to most types of retinal neurons and glia, as well as cell type–specific promoters for restricted gene expression in distinct neuronal subtypes. Within the scope of neuroscience applications and for gene therapy, it is now routine to express reporter genes, replacement genes, neuronal activity indicators, and microbial opsins in specific neuronal types in the mouse retina. However, there are considerable anatomical, physiological, immunological, and behavioral differences between the mouse and the human that limit the usefulness of these tools in humans and nonhuman primates. Several advances are now being made toward the goal of applying viral targeting tools to understand the primate retina. Here, we describe these advances, consider their potential to advance our understanding of the primate retina, and describe what will be needed to move forward.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev-vision-102016-061413

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Adenoviral vectors tend to be rapidly cleared due to the presence of neutralizing antibodies from pre-existing immunity.

    “However, these vectors tend to be rapidly cleared due to the presence of neutralizing antibodies from pre-existing immunity.4,29,54–56”
  • Retroviruses and lentiviruses carry risks for insertional mutagenesis and germline transmission and may elicit more inflammatory responses than AAVs.

    “However, they carry risks for insertional mutagenesis and germline transmission and may elicit more inflammatory responses than AAVs.54,56,73”
  • Adenoviral vectors show good safety when administered to target tissues, do not integrate in the recipient genome, successfully transduce retinal cells, and can carry genes of around 30 kb long.

    “These viruses show good safety when administered to target tissues, do not integrate in the recipient genome, successfully transduce retinal cells, and can carry genes of around 30 kb long.4,29,54–56”
  • RPE cells can be targeted using AAV1, AAV4, AAV6, or the engineered AAV2-7m8 vector; photoreceptors and Müller glial cells are targeted by serotypes AAV2, AAV5, AAV6, AAV7, AAV8, AAV9, AAV2-7m8, and AAV8BP2.

    “RPE cells can be targeted using AAV1, AAV4, or AAV6 vectors or with the engineered AAV2-7m8 vector, and photoreceptors and Müller glial cells are targeted by serotypes AAV2, AAV5, AAV6, AAV7, AAV8, and AAV9 as well as engineered AAV2-7m8 and AAV8BP2 vectors.56,112–116”
  • Adenoviruses and AAVs are known to have tissue-specific tropisms that make certain serotypes attractive for development of retinal gene therapy products.

    “Adenoviruses and AAVs are known to have tissue-specific tropisms that make certain serotypes attractive for development of retinal gene therapy products.14,29,56”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 109 · Cited by 67

Authors
Planul, A., & Dalkara, D.
Affiliations
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
Venue
Annual Review of Vision Science
Published
2017-09-15
Volume
3
Issue
1
Pages
121-140
ISSN
  • 2374-4642 (ISSN-L)
  • 2374-4650
OpenAlex
W2589218963
Cited by
67
References
109
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 1
FWCI
0.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Annual Review of Vision Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Retinal Development and Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Virus-based gene therapy research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Interference and Gene Delivery
Keywords
retinal gene delivery, viral vectors, retinal gene therapy, cell type-specific promoters, retinal neurons, retinal glia, reporter genes, microbial opsins, primate retina
MeSH terms
Adenoviridae, Animals, Genetic Vectors, Humans, Primates, Promoter Regions, Genetic, Retinal Diseases, Genetic Therapy, Lentivirus, Gene Transfer Techniques, Nanoparticles, Optogenetics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review