Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,104

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Evolutionary Processes in Close Binary Systems

Paczynski, B.·1971·Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics

Abstract

The structure and evolution of the stars constitute one of the main prob­ lems of modern astrophysics. Binary stars are so common that it is not pos­ sible to develop a comprehensive theory of stellar structure and evolution without taking into account the duplicity of so many objects. According to }aschek & Gomez (1970) 50% o f the main-sequence stars are binaries. Van Albada & Blaauw (1967) estimated that 60% of the early-type stars are double with mass ratio larger than 0.2. Some types of objects are found in binary systems only: metallic-line stars (Abt 1961, 1965, Abt & Bidelman 1969), U Germinorum variables and novae (Kraft 1962, 1963, 1964), a large fraction of Wolf-Rayet stars (Underhill 1968). Hoyle (1964) and McCrea (1964) suggested that blue stragglers in open and globular clusters are the products of mass exchange in close binaries. This idea found some observa­ tional support in the case of open clusters (Cannon 1968, Deutch 1969, Strom & Strom 1970). Blaauw (1961) suggested that the early-type run­ away stars had escaped from close binaries disrupted as a result of a super­ nova explosion of another component. Binaries are considered to be possible candidates for X-ray sources (Shklovsky 1967, Cameron & Mock 1967, Prendergast & Burbidge 1968). The general evolution of Population I objects is strongly affected by the commonness of binaries within this population. It should be emphasized that duplicity is not found among the Population II stars . I t is also remarkable that none of the 50 known pulsars is in a binary. The most fundamental physical parameter of a star , its mass, may be reliably measured for components of binary systems only. Eclipsing variables allow us to study in some detail the surface of their components. Distribution of mass in a stellar envelope affects the orbital motion and leads to apsidal motion. This phenomenon makes it possible to check the structure of stellar models. It is generally accepted now that mass transfer in a binary from one component to another is the most basic phenomenon in the evolution of such a system. Therefore matteJ1 with a chemical composition modified by nuclear reactions may be expected to be lifted up to the stellar surface. The two out­ standing examples are the binaries HD 30353 and v Sgr (Wallerstein 1968), deficient in hydrogen and overabundant in nitrogen. The matter that is visi-

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev.aa.09.090171.001151

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,104

Metadata

Authors
Paczynski, B.
Venue
Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics
Published
1971-09
Volume
9
Issue
1
Pages
183-208
ISSN
  • 0066-4146 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-4282
OpenAlex
W2157017092
Cited by
1,104
References
0
FWCI
14.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evolutionary Processes in Close Binary Systems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1146/annurev.aa.09.090171.001151
The paper
Paczynski, B. (1971). Evolutionary Processes in Close Binary Systems. Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.aa.09.090171.001151

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.