The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Anthropology of Food and Eating
Abstract
▪ Abstract The study of food and eating has a long history in anthropology, beginning in the nineteenth century with Garrick Mallery and William Robertson Smith. This review notes landmark studies prior to the 1980s, sketching the history of the subfield. We concentrate primarily, however, on works published after 1984. We contend that the study of food and eating is important both for its own sake since food is utterly essential to human existence (and often insufficiently available) and because the subfield has proved valuable for debating and advancing anthropological theory and research methods. Food studies have illuminated broad societal processes such as political-economic value-creation, symbolic value-creation, and the social construction of memory. Such studies have also proved an important arena for debating the relative merits of cultural and historical materialism vs. structuralist or symbolic explanations for human behavior, and for refining our understanding of variation in informants' responses to ethnographic questions. Seven subsections examine classic food ethnographies: single commodities and substances; food and social change; food insecurity; eating and ritual; eating and identities; and instructional materials. The richest, most extensive anthropological work among these subtopics has focused on food insecurity, eating and ritual, and eating and identities. For topics whose anthropological coverage has not been extensive (e.g., book-length studies of single commodities, or works on the industrialization of food systems), useful publications from sister disciplines—primarily sociology and history—are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Sweetness and power : the place of sugar in modern history
Roxborough, I., & Mintz, S. W. (1986) · Man · doi:10.2307/2803144 · Cited by 1,769
Self-citationChinese Table Manners: You Are How You Eat
Cooper, E. (1986) · Human Organization · doi:10.17730/humo.45.2.4034u85x3058m025 · Cited by 38 · cited 1×
“The second question—^how people use the act of eating as a vehicle for ritual— includes the study of food etiquette (Cooper 1986) and how such etiquette is implemented to express and create spirituality.”
Background
Cited by
Food taboos: their origins and purposes
Meyer-Rochow, V. B. (2009) · Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine · doi:10.1186/1746-4269-5-18 · Cited by 448
Monteiro, C. A., Cannon, G., Moubarac, J.-C., Martins, A. P. B., Martins, C. A., Garzillo, J., Canella, D. S., Baraldi, L. G., Barciotte, M., Louzada, M. L. D. C., et al. (2015) · Public Health Nutrition · doi:10.1017/s1368980015002165 · Cited by 347
Liquid Relationship to Possessions
Bardhi, F., Eckhardt, G. M., & Arnould, E. J. (2012) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/664037 · Cited by 324
Sutton, D. E. (2010) · Annual Review of Anthropology · doi:10.1146/annurev.anthro.012809.104957 · Cited by 287
Weaver, L. J., & Hadley, C. (2009) · Ecology of Food and Nutrition · doi:10.1080/03670240903001167 · Cited by 275
Metadata
- Authors
- Mintz, S. W., & Du Bois, C. M.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Anthropology
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 2002-10
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 99-119
- ISSN
- 0084-6570 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-4290
- OpenAlex
- W2161643606
- Cited by
- 1,174
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 0.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Anthropology of Food and Eating. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1146/annurev.anthro.32.032702.131011
- The paper
- Mintz, S. W., & Du Bois, C. M. (2002). The Anthropology of Food and Eating. Annual Review of Anthropology. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.32.032702.131011
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.