The DOI matches its Crossref record; 46 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Food taboos: their origins and purposes
Open accessAbstract
Food taboos are known from virtually all human societies. Most religions declare certain food items fit and others unfit for human consumption. Dietary rules and regulations may govern particular phases of the human life cycle and may be associated with special events such as menstrual period, pregnancy, childbirth, lactation, and -- in traditional societies -- preparation for the hunt, battle, wedding, funeral, etc. On a comparative basis many food taboos seem to make no sense at all, as to what may be declared unfit by one group may be perfectly acceptable to another. On the other hand, food taboos have a long history and one ought to expect a sound explanation for the existence (and persistence) of certain dietary customs in a given culture. Yet, this is a highly debated view and no single theory may explain why people employ special food taboos. This paper wants to revive interest in food taboo research and attempts a functionalist's explanation. However, to illustrate some of the complexity of possible reasons for food taboo five examples have been chosen, namely traditional food taboos in orthodox Jewish and Hindu societies as well as reports on aspects of dietary restrictions in communities with traditional lifestyles of Malaysia, Papua New Guinea, and Nigeria. An ecological or medical background is apparent for many, including some that are seen as religious or spiritual in origin. On the one hand food taboos can help utilizing a resource more efficiently; on the other food taboos can lead to the protection of a resource. Food taboos, whether scientifically correct or not, are often meant to protect the human individual and the observation, for example, that certain allergies and depression are associated with each other could have led to declaring food items taboo that were identified as causal agents for the allergies. Moreover, any food taboo, acknowledged by a particular group of people as part of its ways, aids in the cohesion of this group, helps that particular group maintain its identity in the face of others, and therefore creates a feeling of "belonging".
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Purity and Danger: An Analysis of Concepts of Pollution and Taboo
McCormack, W., & Douglas, M. (1967) · Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion · doi:10.2307/1384077 · Cited by 5,752
Douglas, M. (2003) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203361832 · Cited by 5,078
Purity and Danger: An Analysis of Concepts of Pollution and Taboo.
Ardener, E., & Douglas, M. (1967) · Man · doi:10.2307/2798681 · Cited by 2,811
Argonauts of the Western Pacific.
Schwiedland, E., Malinowski, B., & Frazer, J. (1923) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/2222904 · Cited by 2,681
Argonauts of the Western Pacific
Malinowski, B. (2002) · doi:10.4324/9780203421260 · Cited by 2,160
How emotions affect eating: a five-way model
Macht, M. (2008) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2007.07.002 · Cited by 1,396
The Anthropology of Food and Eating
Mintz, S. W., & Du Bois, C. M. (2002) · Annual Review of Anthropology · doi:10.1146/annurev.anthro.32.032702.131011 · Cited by 1,174
Traditional Marine Conservation Methods in Oceania and Their Demise
Johannes, R. E. (1978) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.es.09.110178.002025 · Cited by 740
Unconventional Viruses and the Origin and Disappearance of Kuru
Gajdusek, D. C. (1977) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.142303 · Cited by 671
Good to Eat: Riddles of Food and Culture.
Sanderson, S. K., & Harris, M. (1987) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2070343 · Cited by 494
Cited by
Insects as food: Exploring cultural exposure and individual experience as determinants of acceptance
Tan, H. S. G., Fischer, A. R. H., Tinchan, P., Stieger, M., Steenbekkers, L. P. A., & van Trijp, H. C. M. (2015) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2015.01.013 · Cited by 500
Menozzi, D., Sogari, G., Veneziani, M., Simoni, E., & Mora, C. (2017) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2017.02.001 · Cited by 367
Willingness to pay for insect-based food: The role of information and carrier
Lombardi, A., Vecchio, R., Borrello, M., Caracciolo, F., & Cembalo, L. (2019) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2018.10.001 · Cited by 243
Desalegn, B. B., Lambert, C., Riedel, S., Negese, T., & Biesalski, H. K. (2018) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph15081767 · Cited by 67
Placentino, U., Sogari, G., Viscecchia, R., De Devitiis, B., & Monacis, L. (2021) · Foods · doi:10.3390/foods10051117 · Cited by 53
Metadata
- Authors
- Meyer-Rochow, V. B.
- Venue
- Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
- Published
- 2009-06-29
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 18-18
- ISSN
- 1746-4269 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2053181824
- Cited by
- 448
- References
- 46
- FWCI
- 13.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Food taboos: their origins and purposes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/1746-4269-5-18
- The paper
- Meyer-Rochow, V. B. (2009). Food taboos: their origins and purposes. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine. https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-4269-5-18
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.