Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 330

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

MIXING IN STARS

Pinsonneault, M.·1997·Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics

Abstract

▪ Abstract Three cases for mixing not present in standard stellar models are presented: Light element depletion in low mass main-sequence stars, deep mixing in massive stars, and deep mixing in low mass giants. The review begins with the mixing indicators and the predictions of standard models. The observational evidence for anomalous mixing is then presented, followed by the physics of mixing outside the standard model. The status of theoretical models that include extra mixing is then examined.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev.astro.35.1.557

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 330

Metadata

Authors
Pinsonneault, M.
Venue
Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics
Published
1997-09
Volume
35
Issue
1
Pages
557-605
ISSN
  • 0066-4146 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-4282
OpenAlex
W2168745957
Cited by
330
References
3
FWCI
1.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: MIXING IN STARS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1146/annurev.astro.35.1.557
The paper
Pinsonneault, M. (1997). MIXING IN STARS. Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.astro.35.1.557

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.