Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 293

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 230 of the 230 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Adequacy of Stellar Evolution Models for the Interpretation of the Color-Magnitude Diagrams of Resolved Stellar Populations

Gallart, C., Zoccali, M., Aparicio, A.·2005·Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics

Abstract

▪ Abstract Most of what we know about the stellar population of nearby, resolved galaxies comes from the interpretation of their color-magnitude diagrams, by comparison with stellar evolutionary models. We review how well current stellar evolution models reproduce the properties of simple stellar populations. Emphasis is given to the regions of the color-magnitude diagram which are most useful for deriving age, metallicity, or distance of a population. Extensive comparison is made between the predictions of the most-used stellar evolution libraries, in order to estimate how model dependent the results are. The present review, written from a user perspective, aims at emphasizing the strengths and weaknesses of the models, and is intended both for observers and theoreticians. We hope to encourage observers to provide stronger observational constraints where they are needed, and to stimulate theoreticians to isolate the input physics responsible for the different behavior between models and the reasons for the discrepancies with data.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev.astro.43.072103.150608

Cites

230 of 230 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 230 references

Cited by

See all 293

Metadata

Authors
Gallart, C., Zoccali, M., & Aparicio, A.
Venue
Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics
Published
2005-09-01
Volume
43
Issue
1
Pages
387-434
ISSN
  • 0066-4146 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-4282
OpenAlex
W2168664302
Cited by
293
References
230
FWCI
1.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Adequacy of Stellar Evolution Models for the Interpretation of the Color-Magnitude Diagrams of Resolved Stellar Populations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1146/annurev.astro.43.072103.150608
The paper
Gallart, C., Zoccali, M., & Aparicio, A. (2005). The Adequacy of Stellar Evolution Models for the Interpretation of the Color-Magnitude Diagrams of Resolved Stellar Populations. Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.astro.43.072103.150608

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.