Cited by 335Stellar, planetary, and galactic studiesGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, PhenomenaAstronomy and Astrophysical Research

THE ACS NEARBY GALAXY SURVEY TREASURY. IX. CONSTRAINING ASYMPTOTIC GIANT BRANCH EVOLUTION WITH OLD METAL-POOR GALAXIES

Open access
Girardi, Léo, Williams, Benjamin F., Gilbert, Karoline M., Rosenfield, Philip, Dalcanton, Julianne J., Marigo, Paola, Boyer, Martha L., Dolphin, Andrew +5 more·2010·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

In an attempt to constrain evolutionary models of the asymptotic giant branch (AGB) phase at the limit of low masses and low metallicities, we have examined the luminosity functions and number ratios between AGB and red giant branch (RGB) stars from a sample of resolved galaxies from the ACS Nearby Galaxy Survey Treasury. This database provides Hubble Space Telescope optical photometry together with maps of completeness, photometric errors, and star formation histories for dozens of galaxies within 4 Mpc. We select 12 galaxies characterized by predominantly metal-poor populations as indicated by a very steep and blue RGB, and which do not present any indication of recent star formation in their color–magnitude diagrams. Thousands of AGB stars brighter than the tip of the RGB (TRGB) are present in the sample (between 60 and 400 per galaxy), hence, the Poisson noise has little impact in our measurements of the AGB/RGB ratio. We model the photometric data with a few sets of thermally pulsing AGB (TP-AGB) evolutionary models with different prescriptions for the mass loss. This technique allows us to set stringent constraints on the TP-AGB models of low-mass, metal-poor stars (with M < 1.5 M ☉ , ). Indeed, those which satisfactorily reproduce the observed AGB/RGB ratios have TP-AGB lifetimes between 1.2 and 1.8 Myr, and finish their nuclear burning lives with masses between 0.51 and 0.55 M ☉ . This is also in good agreement with recent observations of white dwarf masses in the M4 old globular cluster. These constraints can be added to those already derived from Magellanic Cloud star clusters as important mileposts in the arduous process of calibrating AGB evolutionary models.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/0004-637x/724/2/1030

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • They repeated the entire SFH fitting for a representative subset of roughly one third of their regions using MIST isochrones in place of Padova tracks.

    “To assess the impact of these model choices in PHAST, we repeated the entire SFH fitting for a representative subset consisting of roughly a third of our regions using the MIST (Choi et al. 2016) isochrones in place of the Padova (Marigo et al. 2008; Girardi et al. 2010) tracks.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Girardi, L., Williams, B. F., Gilbert, K. M., Rosenfield, P., Dalcanton, J. J., Marigo, P., Boyer, M. L., Dolphin, A., Weisz, D. R., Melbourne, J., Olsen, K. A. G., Seth, A. C., & Skillman, E.
Affiliations
  • Osservatorio Astronomico di Padova (IT)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • University of Padua (IT)
  • Space Telescope Science Institute (US)
  • RTX (United States) (US)
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • California Institute of Technology (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2010-11-10
Volume
724
Issue
2
Pages
1030-1043
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W2108706852
Cited by
335
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 39 · 2014: 45 · 2013: 43 · 2012: 50
FWCI
20.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Astrophysical Journal (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • Padua Research Archive (University of Padova) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NAS 526555, 526555)
  • California Institute of Technology
  • Space Telescope Science Institute (NAS5- 26555, 5-26555, 26555)
  • Jet Propulsion Laboratory
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Instrumentation › Astronomy and Astrophysical Research
Keywords
asymptotic giant branch, thermally pulsing AGB, tip of the red giant branch, metal-poor galaxies, low-mass stars, mass loss, white dwarf mass, globular clusters, Magellanic Clouds

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review