Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,041

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Flexibility of DNA

Hagerman, Paul J.·1988·Annual Review of Biophysics and Biophysical Chemistry

Abstract

Both microscopic and macroscopic models of DNA flexibility should lead to the same quantitative description of the elastic properties of the DNA helix. This belief is reinforced by the fact that essentially all experimental (solution) studies to date support the macroscopic, elastic model. The performance of microscopic models can therefore be checked by their ability to produce the correct macroscopic quantities (P and C). To most carefully address the influence of such factors as base sequence, DNA damage, and drug or protein interaction on the flexibility of DNA, methods are required that are most sensitive for DNA molecules of less than 500-1000 bp. The use of molecules in this size range will maximize the signal due to the structural alteration as well as facilitate the construction of DNA sequences of any desired arrangement. I have emphasized three such methods and summarized their strengths and weaknesses; however, their concurrent application to the determination of DNA flexibility provides an important check of self-consistency. These studies have indicated that the persistence length of DNA in buffers of moderate salt concentration is 450-500 A. Synthetic DNA is now readily available, and many procedures for the construction and cloning of DNA molecules of defined length and sequence (107-108a) are in common use. The availability of restriction fragments of precisely defined length has transformed the study of the physical (particularly hydrodynamic) properties of such molecules, since the hitherto pervasive problem of length polydispersity has been eliminated. Sheared, sonicated, or otherwise abused calf thymus (or other) DNAs should no longer be considered acceptable materials for physical studies. Many studies of bending and torsional fluctuations in DNA have been excluded from this discussion because the DNA samples used were not precisely defined. The torsional elastic constant of DNA has been fairly well established as approximately 3.0 x 10(-19) erg-cm, mainly through a combination of elegant theoretical and experimental studies of topoisomer distributions in circular DNA molecules. The other general approach to the determination of the torsional elastic constant, luminescence decay, is still burdened by the poor characterization of the DNA used in many of the experimental studies as well as by some continued theoretical uncertainties.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev.bb.17.060188.001405

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,041

Metadata

Authors
Hagerman, P. J.
Venue
Annual Review of Biophysics and Biophysical Chemistry
Published
1988-06
Volume
17
Issue
1
Pages
265-286
ISSN
0883-9182 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2174021414
Cited by
1,041
References
0
FWCI
4.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Flexibility of DNA. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1146/annurev.bb.17.060188.001405
The paper
Hagerman, P. J. (1988). Flexibility of DNA. Annual Review of Biophysics and Biophysical Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.bb.17.060188.001405

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.