The DOI matches its Crossref record.
THE MULTIPLICITY OF DOMAINS IN PROTEINS
Abstract
The domainal nature of proteins is well established. What is less certain is how many domains are evolutionarily mobile in that they occur in otherwise nonhomologous proteins or in different sequential locations in homologous proteins. The combinatorial advantage of shuffling domains around into diverse settings is obvious. Those domains that have been shuffled about in recent evolutionary times, within the last half billion years or so, can usually be identified on the basis of sequence resemblances alone. Contrarily, domains that were rearranged in ancient times may only be apparent after three-dimensional analysis, their sequence resemblances having been eroded over time. The shuffling of domains in recently evolved proteins has been greatly promoted by introns, but this does not imply that all domainal rearrangements involve introns. Only a small fraction of known exons show evidence of having been shuffled. Taken in aggregate, the available data best fit a scenario whereby a relative small number of genes encoding domain-sized polypeptides has been expanded by duplication and modification with a burst of exceptional genomic rearrangement.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome
International Human Genome Sequencing Consortium, Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research, C. F. G. R., Lander, E. S., Linton, L. M., Birren, B., Nusbaum, C., Zody, M. C., Baldwin, J., Devon, K., Dewar, K., et al. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35057062 · Cited by 24,216
OrthoMCL: Identification of Ortholog Groups for Eukaryotic Genomes
Li, L., Stoeckert, C. J., & Roos, D. S. (2003) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.1224503 · Cited by 5,707
The extended protein kinase C superfamily
MELLOR, H., & PARKER, P. J. (1998) · Biochemical Journal · doi:10.1042/bj3320281 · Cited by 1,538
Alternative splicing and evolution: diversification, exon definition and function
Keren, H., Lev-Maor, G., & Ast, G. (2010) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg2776 · Cited by 1,082
Synthesis of Native Proteins by Chemical Ligation
Dawson, P. E., & Kent, S. B. H. (2000) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev.biochem.69.1.923 · Cited by 1,082
Metadata
- Authors
- Doolittle, R. F.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Biochemistry
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 1995-06
- Volume
- 64
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 287-314
- ISSN
- 0066-4154 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-4509
- OpenAlex
- W1973491891
- Cited by
- 513
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: THE MULTIPLICITY OF DOMAINS IN PROTEINS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1146/annurev.bi.64.070195.001443
- The paper
- Doolittle, R. F. (1995). THE MULTIPLICITY OF DOMAINS IN PROTEINS. Annual Review of Biochemistry. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.bi.64.070195.001443
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.