The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Boundaries in Development: Formation and Function
Abstract
▪ Abstract Developing organisms may contain billions of cells destined to differentiate in numerous different ways. One strategy organisms use to simplify the orchestration of development is the separation of cell populations into distinct functional units. Our expanding knowledge of boundary formation and function in different systems is beginning to reveal general principles of this process. Fields of cells are subdivided by the interpretation of morphogen gradients, and these subdivisions are then maintained and refined by local cell-cell interactions. Sharp and stable separation between cell populations requires special mechanisms to keep cells segregated, which in many cases appear to involve the regulation of cell affinity. Once cell populations become distinct, specialized cells are often induced along the borders between them. These boundary cells can then influence the patterning of surrounding cells, which can result in progressively finer subdivisions of a tissue. Much has been learned about the signaling pathways that establish boundaries, but a key challenge for the future remains to elucidate the cellular and molecular mechanisms that actually keep cell populations separated.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Steinberg, M. S., & Takeichi, M. (1994) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.91.1.206 · Cited by 572
Cited by
Role of Glycosylation in Development
Haltiwanger, R. S., & Lowe, J. B. (2004) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev.biochem.73.011303.074043 · Cited by 757
Regulation of Notch Signaling by O-Linked Fucose
Okajima, T., & Irvine, K. D. (2002) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(02)01114-5 · Cited by 386
Self-citationA Conserved Molecular Framework for Compound Leaf Development
Blein, T., Pulido, A., Vialette-Guiraud, A., Nikovics, K., Morin, H., Hay, A., Johansen, I. E., Tsiantis, M., & Laufs, P. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1166168 · Cited by 360
Morpheus Unbound: Reimagining the Morphogen Gradient
Lander, A. D. (2007) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2007.01.004 · Cited by 331
Lhx2 Selector Activity Specifies Cortical Identity and Suppresses Hippocampal Organizer Fate
Mangale, V. S., Hirokawa, K. E., Satyaki, P. R. V., Gokulchandran, N., Chikbire, S., Subramanian, L., Shetty, A. S., Martynoga, B., Paul, J., Mai, M. V., et al. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1151695 · Cited by 316
Metadata
- Authors
- Irvine, K. D., & Rauskolb, C.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 2001-11
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 189-214
- ISSN
- 1081-0706 (ISSN-L)
- 1530-8995
- OpenAlex
- W2127587858
- Cited by
- 218
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 0.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Boundaries in Development: Formation and Function. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1146/annurev.cellbio.17.1.189
- The paper
- Irvine, K. D., & Rauskolb, C. (2001). Boundaries in Development: Formation and Function. Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.cellbio.17.1.189
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.