Cited by 271

Control of Developmental Timing by MicroRNAs and Their Targets

Pasquinelli, Amy E., Ruvkun, Gary·2002·Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology

Abstract

▪ Abstract In Caenorhabditis elegans the timing of many developmental events is regulated by heterochronic genes. Such genes orchestrate the timing of cell divisions and fates appropriate for the developmental stage of an organism. Analyses of heterochronic mutations in the nematode C. elegans have revealed a genetic pathway that controls the timing of post-embryonic cell divisions and fates. Two of the genes in this pathway encode small regulatory RNAs. The 22 nucleotide (nt) RNAs downregulate the expression of protein-coding mRNAs of target heterochronic genes. Analogous variations in the timing of appearance of particular features have been noted among closely related species, suggesting that such explicit control of developmental timing may not be exclusive to C. elegans. In fact, some of the genes that globally pattern the temporal progression of C. elegans development, including one of the tiny RNA genes, are conserved and temporally regulated across much of animal phylogeny, suggesting that the molecular mechanisms of temporal control are ancient and universal. A very large family of tiny RNA genes called microRNAs, which are similar in structure to the heterochronic regulatory RNAs, have been detected in diverse animal species and are likely to be present in most metazoans. Functions of the newly discovered microRNAs are not yet known. Other examples of temporal programs during growth include the exquisitely choreographed temporal sequences of developmental fates in neurogenesis in Drosophila and the sequential programs of epidermal coloration in insect wing patterning. An interesting possibility is that microRNAs mediate transitions on a variety of time scales to pattern the activities of particular target protein-coding genes and in turn generate sets of cells over a period of time. Plasticity in these microRNA genes or their targets may lead to changes in relative developmental timing between related species, or heterochronic change. Instead of inventing new gene functions, even subtle changes in temporal expression of pre-existing control genes can result in speciation by altering the time at which they function.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.18.012502.105832

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pasquinelli, A. E., & Ruvkun, G.
Venue
Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology
Published
2002-11
Volume
18
Issue
1
Pages
495-513
ISSN
  • 1081-0706
  • 1530-8995
Cited by
271
References
2
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review