Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 255

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

RATES OF BIOGEOCHEMICAL PROCESSES IN ANOXIC SEDIMENTS

Open access
Reeburgh, William S.·1983·Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences

Abstract

Emphasises and summarises rate measurement of a number of processes important in remineralizing organic matter. It is necessary to show that the rates of all processes occurring in a given sediment are internally consistent. Sulfate reduction is the dominant reaction in terms of its organic matter, oxidising capacity, and is easily measured. Ammonium production can also be measured reliably.-from Author

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev.ea.11.050183.001413

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 255

Metadata

Authors
Reeburgh, W. S.
Venue
Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences
Published
1983-05
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
269-298
ISSN
  • 0084-6597 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-4495
OpenAlex
W2169031966
Cited by
255
References
1
FWCI
6.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: RATES OF BIOGEOCHEMICAL PROCESSES IN ANOXIC SEDIMENTS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1146/annurev.ea.11.050183.001413
The paper
Reeburgh, W. S. (1983). RATES OF BIOGEOCHEMICAL PROCESSES IN ANOXIC SEDIMENTS. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ea.11.050183.001413

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.