Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 875

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

STROMATOLITES IN PRECAMBRIAN CARBONATES: Evolutionary Mileposts or Environmental Dipsticks?

Grotzinger, John P., Knoll, Andrew H.·1999·Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences

Abstract

▪ Abstract Stromatolites are attached, lithified sedimentary growth structures, accretionary away from a point or limited surface of initiation. Though the accretion process is commonly regarded to result from the sediment trapping or precipitation-inducing activities of microbial mats, little evidence of this process is preserved in most Precambrian stromatolites. The successful study and interpretation of stromatolites requires a process-based approach, oriented toward deconvolving the replacement textures of ancient stromatolites. The effects of diagenetic recrystallization first must be accounted for, followed by analysis of lamination textures and deduction of possible accretion mechanisms. Accretion hypotheses can be tested using numerical simulations based on modern stromatolite growth processes. Application of this approach has shown that stromatolites were originally formed largely through in situ precipitation of laminae during Archean and older Proterozoic times, but that younger Proterozoic stromatolites grew largely through the accretion of carbonate sediments, most likely through the physical process of microbial trapping and binding. This trend most likely reflects long-term evolution of the earth's environment rather than microbial communities.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev.earth.27.1.313

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

  • Fractal Concepts in Surface Growth

    Barabási, A. L., & Stanley, H. E. (1995) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511599798 · Cited by 3,925 · cited 2×

    “…(compare Matsushita & Fujikawa 1990 with Ben-Jacob et al 1994), as well as purely abiotic systems (compare Kardar et al 1986 with Matsushita et al 1985) that have qualitatively identical appearances and often quantitatively similar scaling relationships (see summary in Barabasi & Stanley 1995).”
    BackgroundMethod
  • New constraints on Precambrian ocean composition

    Grotzinger, J. P., & Kasting, J. F. (1993) · The Journal of Geology · doi:10.1086/648218 · Cited by 424 · cited 2×

    “…crusts, it is clear that these crusts decline in importance through Proterozoic time (Grotzinger 1989, 1990, 1994; P1: APR/SAT/spd P2: NBL/plb QC: NBL/anil T1: NBL March 26, 1999 14:40 Annual Reviews AR081-10 PRECAMBRIAN STROMATOLITES 331 Grotzinger & Kasting 1993; Grotzinger & Knoll 1995).”
    BackgroundSelf-citation

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 875

Metadata

Authors
Grotzinger, J. P., & Knoll, A. H.
Venue
Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences
Published
1999-05
Volume
27
Issue
1
Pages
313-358
ISSN
  • 0084-6597 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-4495
OpenAlex
W2142539052
Cited by
875
References
2
FWCI
2.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: STROMATOLITES IN PRECAMBRIAN CARBONATES: Evolutionary Mileposts or Environmental Dipsticks? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1146/annurev.earth.27.1.313
The paper
Grotzinger, J. P., & Knoll, A. H. (1999). STROMATOLITES IN PRECAMBRIAN CARBONATES: Evolutionary Mileposts or Environmental Dipsticks? Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.earth.27.1.313

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.