The DOI matches its Crossref record; 95 of the 95 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Conspecific Sperm and Pollen Precedence and Speciation
Abstract
▪ Abstract The evolution of reproductive isolation is perhaps the most significant stage in the process of species formation, and the study of reproductive barriers currently dominates investigations of speciation. The discovery that conspecific sperm and pollen precedence play an important role in the reproductive isolation of some closely related animals and plants is one of the real surprises to emerge from this field in recent years. This review begins with a brief history of the study of reproductive isolation with the aim of understanding why conspecific sperm and pollen precedence were generally overlooked in early work on reproductive barriers. It then examines: case studies, the prevalence of conspecific sperm and pollen precedence, the isolating potential of this class of reproductive barriers, the mechanisms that account for the operation of these barriers, and potential explanations for the rapid divergence of populations in traits related to fertilization. Conspecific sperm and pollen precedence appear to be quite effective in limiting gene exchange; these barriers are widespread although not universal in animals and plants, and they operate through a number of different mechanisms. Much more work remains to be done on a number of fronts to elucidate the processes responsible for the evolution of these reproductive barriers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mayr, E. (1963) · doi:10.4159/harvard.9780674865327 · Cited by 10,175
Genetics and the Origin of Species
(1952) · AIBS Bulletin · doi:10.1093/aibsbulletin/2.2.14-b · Cited by 3,935
SPERM COMPETITION AND ITS EVOLUTIONARY CONSEQUENCES IN THE INSECTS
PARKER, G. A. (1970) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1469-185x.1970.tb01176.x · Cited by 3,596
Endless Forms: Species and Speciation
Howard, D. J., & Berlocher, S. H. (1998) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,490
Self-citationSperm Competition and Sexual Selection
Møller, A. P. (1998) · Sperm Competition and Sexual Selection · doi:10.1016/b978-012100543-6/50027-1 · Cited by 2,074
Hughes, A. L., & Nei, M. (1988) · Nature · doi:10.1038/335167a0 · Cited by 1,969
Genetics and the Origin of Species
Schmidt, K. P., & Dobzhansky, T. (1938) · Copeia · doi:10.2307/1435536 · Cited by 1,732
Genetic Divergence, Reproductive Isolation, and Marine Speciation
Palumbi, S. R. (1994) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.25.1.547 · Cited by 1,684
Genetics of the Evolutionary Process
Sheppard, P. M. (1971) · Journal of Medical Genetics · doi:10.1136/jmg.8.4.545-b · Cited by 1,627
Genetics of the Evolutionary Process.
Dobzhansky, T. (1970) · doi:10.5281/zenodo.10742832 · Cited by 1,532
Cited by
The Role of Reinforcement in Speciation: Theory and Data
Servedio, M. R., & Noor, M. A. F. (2003) · Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.34.011802.132412 · Cited by 939
Reproductive Interference Between Animal Species
Gröning, J., & Hochkirch, A. (2008) · The Quarterly Review of Biology · doi:10.1086/590510 · Cited by 594
Mate Choice and Genetic Quality: A Review of the Heterozygosity Theory
Kempenaers, B. (2007) · Advances in the Study of Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0065-3454(07)37005-8 · Cited by 322
The genetic basis of speciation in the Giliopsis lineage of Ipomopsis (Polemoniaceae)
Nakazato, T., Rieseberg, L. H., & Wood, T. E. (2013) · Heredity · doi:10.1038/hdy.2013.41 · Cited by 33
Metadata
- Authors
- Howard, D. J.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 1999-11
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 109-132
- ISSN
- 0066-4162 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2137674948
- Cited by
- 316
- References
- 95
- FWCI
- 12.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Conspecific Sperm and Pollen Precedence and Speciation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.30.1.109
- The paper
- Howard, D. J. (1999). Conspecific Sperm and Pollen Precedence and Speciation. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.30.1.109
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.