The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Evolutionary Ecology of Tolerance to Consumer Damage
Abstract
▪ Abstract Recent theoretical studies suggest that the ability to tolerate consumer damage can be an important adaptive response by plants to selection imposed by consumers. Empirical studies have also found that tolerance is a common response to consumers among plants. Currently recognized mechanisms underlying tolerance include several general sets of traits: allocation patterns; plant architecture; and various other traits that may respond to consumer damage, e.g., photosynthetic rate. Theoretical studies suggest that tolerance to consumer damage may be favored under a range of conditions, even when the risk and intensity of damage varies. However, most of these models assume that the evolution of tolerance is constrained by internal resource allocation trade-offs. While there is some empirical evidence for such trade-offs, it is also clear that external constraints such as pollinator abundance or nutrient availability may also limit the evolution of tolerance. Current research also suggests that a full understanding of plant adaptation to consumers can only be achieved by investigating the joint evolution of tolerance and resistance. While tolerance to consumer damage has just recently received significant attention in the ecological literature, our understanding of it is rapidly increasing as its profound ecological and evolutionary implications become better appreciated.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The measurement of selection on correlated characters
Lande, R., & Arnold, S. J. (1983) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1983.tb00236.x · Cited by 5,437
Effects of herbivores on grassland plant diversity
Olff, H., & Ritchie, M. E. (1998) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/s0169-5347(98)01364-0 · Cited by 1,528
Augustine, D. J., & McNaughton, S. J. (1998) · The Journal of Wildlife Management · doi:10.2307/3801981 · Cited by 1,129
Insectivorous Birds Increase Growth of White Oak through Consumption of Leaf-Chewing Insects
Marquis, R. J., & Whelan, C. J. (1994) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/1941605 · Cited by 436
Self-citation
Cited by
Schneider, D. S., & Ayres, J. S. (2008) · Nature Reviews Immunology · doi:10.1038/nri2432 · Cited by 783
Ayres, J. S., & Schneider, D. S. (2012) · Annual Review of Immunology · doi:10.1146/annurev-immunol-020711-075030 · Cited by 475
Why Does Herbivore Attack Reconfigure Primary Metabolism?
Schwachtje, J., & Baldwin, I. T. (2008) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.107.112490 · Cited by 346
Using ‘mute’ plants to translate volatile signals
Paschold, A., Halitschke, R., & Baldwin, I. T. (2006) · The Plant Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1365-313x.2005.02623.x · Cited by 151
Barton, K. E., & Boege, K. (2017) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/ele.12744 · Cited by 144
Metadata
- Authors
- Stowe, K. A., Marquis, R. J., Hochwender, C. G., & Simms, E. L.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 2000-11
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 565-595
- ISSN
- 0066-4162 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2096952029
- Cited by
- 693
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 29.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Evolutionary Ecology of Tolerance to Consumer Damage. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.31.1.565
- The paper
- Stowe, K. A., Marquis, R. J., Hochwender, C. G., & Simms, E. L. (2000). The Evolutionary Ecology of Tolerance to Consumer Damage. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.31.1.565
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.