Future directions in the ontogeny of plant defence: understanding the evolutionary causes and consequences
Abstract
Plant defence often varies by orders of magnitude as plants develop from the seedling to juvenile to mature and senescent stages. Ontogenetic trajectories can involve switches among defence traits, leading to complex shifting phenotypes across plant lifetimes. While considerable research has characterised ontogenetic trajectories for now hundreds of plant species, we still lack a clear understanding of the molecular, ecological and evolutionary factors driving these patterns. In this study, we identify several non-mutually exclusive factors that may have led to the evolution of ontogenetic trajectories in plant defence, including developmental constraints, resource allocation costs, multi-functionality of defence traits, and herbivore selection pressure. Evidence from recent physiological studies is highlighted to shed light on the underlying molecular mechanisms involved in the regulation and activation of these developmental changes. Overall, our goal is to promote new research avenues that would provide evidence for the factors that have promoted the evolution of this complex lifetime phenotype. Future research focusing on the questions and approaches identified here will advance the field and shed light on why defence traits shift so dramatically across plant ontogeny, a widespread but poorly understood ecological pattern.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A drop in secondary metabolite levels a few weeks after germination or at the onset of flowering may reflect an increased need of primary metabolites and nutrients rather than a drop in herbivore pressure.
“A drop in secondary metabolite levels, as is often observed a few weeks after germination or at the onset of flowering, for instance (Meldau et al., 2012;Barton and Boege, 2017), may reflect an increased need of primary metabolites and nutrients rather than a drop in herbivore pressure.”
From Plant Secondary Metabolites as Defenses, Regulators, and Primary Metabolites: The Blurred Functional Trichotomy (2020) · cites this paper as Barton and Boege, 2017
Cites
Defence on demand: mechanisms behind optimal defence patterns
Meldau, S., Erb, M., & Baldwin, I. T. (2012) · Annals of Botany · doi:10.1093/aob/mcs212 · Cited by 197 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Erb, M., & Kliebenstein, D. J. (2020) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.20.00433 · Cited by 1,333 · see citing works
A paradigm shift in our view of species drives current trends in biological classification
Padial, J. M., & De la Riva, I. (2021) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/brv.12676 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Huang, W., Bont, Z., Hervé, M. R., Robert, C. A. M., & Erb, M. (2020) · Journal of Chemical Ecology · doi:10.1007/s10886-019-01126-9 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Felipe, S. H. S., Batista, D. S., Vital, C. E., Chagas, K., Silva, P. O., Silva, T. D., Fortini, E. A., Correia, L. N. D. F., Ávila, R. T., Maldaner, J., et al. (2019) · Plant Physiology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.plaphy.2019.05.002 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
- Authors
- Barton, K. E., & Boege, K.
- Affiliations
- University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa (US)
- Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (MX)
- Corresponding author
- Barton, Kasey E.
- Venue
- Ecology Letters
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2017-02
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 403-411
- ISSN
- 1461-023X (ISSN-L)
- 1461-0248
- OpenAlex
- W2584588850
- Cited by
- 144
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 5
- FWCI
- 16.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Ecology Letters (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (OISE‐1427127)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Insect-Plant Interactions and Control
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
- Keywords
- plant defense, ontogeny, ontogenetic trajectories, developmental constraints, senescence
- MeSH terms
- Biological Evolution, Plants, Food Chain, Plant Development
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review