The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Homogenization of Freshwater Faunas
Abstract
▪ Abstract Biotic homogenization is the increased similarity of biotas over time caused by the replacement of native species with nonindigenous species, usually as a result of introductions by humans. Homogenization is the outcome of three interacting processes: introductions of nonnative species, extirpation of native species, and habitat alterations that facilitate these two processes. A central aspect of the homogenization process is the ability of species to overcome natural biogeographic barriers either through intentional transport by humans or through colonization routes created by human activities. Habitat homogenization through reservoir construction contributes to biotic homogenization as local riverine faunas are replaced with cosmopolitan lentic species. The homogenization process has generally increased biodiversity in most freshwater faunas, as the establishment of new species has outpaced the extinction of native species. There are important exceptions, however, where the establishment of nonindigenous species has had devastating impacts on endemic species. The homogenization process appears likely to continue, although it could be slowed through reductions in the rate of invasions and extirpations and by rehabilitating aquatic habitats so as to favor native species.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Biodiversity and ecosystem productivity in a fluctuating environment: The insurance hypothesis
Yachi, S., & Loreau, M. (1999) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.96.4.1463 · Cited by 3,211
Positive Interactions of Nonindigenous Species: Invasional Meltdown?
Simberloff, D., & Von Holle, B. (1999) · Biological Invasions · doi:10.1023/a:1010086329619 · Cited by 2,231
Hobbs, R. J., & Mooney, H. A. (1998) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.1998.96233.x · Cited by 185
Cited by
Ecological and evolutionary consequences of biotic homogenization
Olden, J. D., LeRoy Poff, N., Douglas, M. R., Douglas, M. E., & Fausch, K. D. (2004) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2003.09.010 · Cited by 1,573
Assemblage Time Series Reveal Biodiversity Change but Not Systematic Loss
Dornelas, M., Gotelli, N. J., McGill, B., Shimadzu, H., Moyes, F., Sievers, C., & Magurran, A. E. (2014) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1248484 · Cited by 1,412
On defining and quantifying biotic homogenization
Olden, J. D., & Rooney, T. P. (2006) · Global Ecology and Biogeography · doi:10.1111/j.1466-822x.2006.00214.x · Cited by 801
Anthropogenic refuges for freshwater biodiversity: Their ecological characteristics and management
Chester, E. T., & Robson, B. J. (2013) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2013.06.016 · Cited by 278
Marchetti, M. P., Moyle, P. B., & Levine, R. (2004) · Freshwater Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2427.2004.01202.x · Cited by 272
(2009) · Cited by 214
Jeffrey, J. D., Hasler, C. T., Chapman, J. M., Cooke, S. J., & Suski, C. D. (2015) · Integrative and Comparative Biology · doi:10.1093/icb/icv022 · Cited by 57
Vegetation-based ecosystem service delivery in urban landscapes: A systematic review
Stroud, S., Peacock, J., & Hassall, C. (2022) · Basic and Applied Ecology · doi:10.1016/j.baae.2022.02.007 · Cited by 46
Metadata
- Authors
- Rahel, F. J.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 2002-11
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 291-315
- ISSN
- 0066-4162 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2111357285
- Cited by
- 852
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 18.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.