The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Individual-Based Modeling of Ecological and Evolutionary Processes
Abstract
▪ Abstract Individual-based models (IBMs) allow the explicit inclusion of individual variation in greater detail than do classical differential-equation and difference-equation models. Inclusion of such variation is important for continued progress in ecological and evolutionary theory. We provide a conceptual basis for IBMs by describing five major types of individual variation in IBMs: spatial, ontogenetic, phenotypic, cognitive, and genetic. IBMs are now used in almost all subfields of ecology and evolutionary biology. We map those subfields and look more closely at selected key papers on fish recruitment, forest dynamics, sympatric speciation, metapopulation dynamics, maintenance of diversity, and species conservation. Theorists are currently divided on whether IBMs represent only a practical tool for extending classical theory to more complex situations, or whether individual-based theory represents a radically new research program. We feel that the tension between these two poles of thinking can be a source of creativity in ecology and evolutionary theory.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Next‐generation dynamic global vegetation models: learning from community ecology
Scheiter, S., Langan, L., & Higgins, S. I. (2013) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.12210 · Cited by 498
Advancing microbial sciences by individual-based modelling
Hellweger, F. L., Clegg, R. J., Clark, J. R., Plugge, C. M., & Kreft, J.-U. (2016) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro.2016.62 · Cited by 202
Using robots to understand social behaviour
Mitri, S., Wischmann, S., Floreano, D., & Keller, L. (2013) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1469-185x.2012.00236.x · Cited by 114
Trends and management implications of human‐influenced life‐history changes in marine ectotherms
Audzijonyte, A., Fulton, E., Haddon, M., Helidoniotis, F., Hobday, A. J., Kuparinen, A., Morrongiello, J., Smith, A. D., Upston, J., & Waples, R. S. (2016) · Fish and Fisheries · doi:10.1111/faf.12156 · Cited by 106
Unnithan Kumar, S., Turnbull, J., Hartman Davies, O., Hodgetts, T., & Cushman, S. A. (2022) · Landscape Ecology · doi:10.1007/s10980-022-01504-x · Cited by 71
Metadata
- Authors
- DeAngelis, D. L., & Mooij, W. M.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 2005-12-01
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 147-168
- ISSN
- 1543-592X (ISSN-L)
- 1545-2069
- OpenAlex
- W2143797502
- Cited by
- 634
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.