The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Biology of Liriomyza
Abstract
The genus Liriomyza. erected in 1894 (52), contains more than 300 species. They are distributed widely but are most commonly found in temperate areas; there are relatively few species in the tropics. Within this genus 23 species are economically important, causing damage to agricultural and ornamental plants by their leaf mining activity (94). Many of these damaging species are polyphagous, which is uncommon among the Agromyzidae; of 2450 de scribed species in this family only 11 are considered to be truly polyphagous, and 5 of these are in the genus Liriomyza (93). Serpentine leaf miner was proposed as a common name for any member of this genus because of the wide distribution, polyphagous nature, and morphological similarity of many of the species (98). The Entomological Society of America has adopted this naming policy, with a few exceptions (112). Indeed, many larvae of Liriomyza create serpentine mines, which are initially very narrow and gradually enlarge (57), often twisting through the leaf. However, the type of mine produced by Liriomyza may be influenced by the developmental stage of the leaf as well as by the host itself (99). Thus, the mines are not always serpentine in all host plants. In addition, mine location in leaves may vary considerably, and either the upper or lower leaf mesophyll may be mined (5, 71). Some species have larval stages that feed in potato tubers (50), bore through stems (34), and feed within seed heads (86). Most of our knowledge concerning the biology of this genus comes from studies on economically important species. These data have been developed largely since 1900, with an explosion of information since 1975 (76). This reflects the dramatic rise of Liriomyza spp. as major pests of numerous ornamental and agricultural crops over the past ten years (72). As a result of
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Knecht, A. A. (1972) · JONA: The Journal of Nursing Administration · doi:10.1097/00005110-197203000-00014 · Cited by 626
Via, S. (1984) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1984.tb00360.x · Cited by 505
Agromyzidae (Diptera) of Economic Importance
Spencer, K. A. (1973) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-017-0683-4 · Cited by 492
Cited by
Life Systems of Polyphagous Arthropod Pests in Temporally Unstable Cropping Systems
Kennedy, G. G., & Storer, N. P. (2000) · Annual Review of Entomology · doi:10.1146/annurev.ento.45.1.467 · Cited by 273
Variation in phytoecdysteroid accumulation in seeds and shoots of Spinacia oleracea L. accessions
Cheng, D. M., Yousef, G. G., & Lila, M. A. (2010) · HortScience · doi:10.21273/hortsci.45.11.1634 · Cited by 18
Metadata
- Authors
- Parrella, M. P.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Entomology
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 1987-01
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 201-224
- ISSN
- 0066-4170 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-4487
- OpenAlex
- W2106788622
- Cited by
- 339
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 5.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Biology of Liriomyza. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1146/annurev.en.32.010187.001221
- The paper
- Parrella, M. P. (1987). Biology of Liriomyza. Annual Review of Entomology. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.en.32.010187.001221
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.