Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 300

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

P ROTECTING A GRICULTURAL C ROPS FROM THE E FFECTS OF T ROPOSPHERIC O ZONE E XPOSURE: Reconciling Science and Standard Setting in the United States, Europe, and Asia

Mauzerall, Denise L., Wang, Xiaoping·2001·Annual Review of Energy and the Environment

Abstract

▪ Abstract Ozone (O 3) is well documented as the air pollutant most damaging to agricultural crops and other plants. Most crops in developed countries are grown in summer when O 3 concentrations are elevated and frequently are sufficiently high to reduce yields. This article examines the difficulties in scientifically determining the reduction in yield that results from the exposure of agricultural crops to surface O 3 and then transforming that knowledge into efficient and effective regulatory standards. The different approaches taken by the United States and Europe in addressing this issue as well as the few studies that have been conducted to date in developing countries are examined and summarized. Extensive research was conducted in the United States during the 1980s but has not been continued. During the 1990s, the European community forged ahead with scientific research and innovative proposals for air-quality standards. These efforts included the development of a “critical level” (CL) for O 3 based on a cumulative exposure above a cutoff concentration below which only an acceptable level of harm is incurred. Current research focuses on estimating O 3 dosage to plants and incorporating this metric into regulatory standards. The US regulatory community can learn from current European scientific research and regulatory strategies, which argue strongly for a separate secondary standard for O 3 to protect vegetation. Increasing impacts of O 3 on crops are likely in developing countries as they continue to industrialize and their emissions of air pollutants increase. More research is needed on surface O 3 concentrations in developing countries, on their projected increase, and on the sensitivity that crop cultivars used in developing countries have to O 3. The threat of reduced agricultural yields due to increasing O 3 concentrations may encourage developing countries to increase their energy efficiency and to use different energy sources. This could simultaneously achieve a local benefit through improved regional air quality and a global benefit through a reduction in the emission of greenhouse gases.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev.energy.26.1.237

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 300

Metadata

Authors
Mauzerall, D. L., & Wang, X.
Venue
Annual Review of Energy and the Environment
Published
2001-11
Volume
26
Issue
1
Pages
237-268
ISSN
1056-3466 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2170860670
Cited by
300
References
0
FWCI
7.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: P ROTECTING A GRICULTURAL C ROPS FROM THE E FFECTS OF T ROPOSPHERIC O ZONE E XPOSURE: Reconciling Science and Standard Setting in the United States, Europe, and Asia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1146/annurev.energy.26.1.237
The paper
Mauzerall, D. L., & Wang, X. (2001). P ROTECTING A GRICULTURAL C ROPS FROM THE E FFECTS OF T ROPOSPHERIC O ZONE E XPOSURE: Reconciling Science and Standard Setting in the United States, Europe, and Asia. Annual Review of Energy and the Environment. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.energy.26.1.237

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.