The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
DEVELOPMENTS IN AQUATIC INSECT BIOMONITORING: A Comparative Analysis of Recent Approaches
Abstract
▪ Abstract Aquatic insects and other benthic invertebrates are the most widely used organisms in freshwater biomonitoring of human impact. Because of the high monetary investment in freshwater management, decisions are often based on biomonitoring results, and a critical and comparative review of different approaches is required. We used 12 criteria that should be fulfilled by an “ideal” biomonitoring tool, addressing the rationale, implementation, and performance of a method. After illustrating how the century-old but still widely used Saprobian system does not meet these criteria, we apply them to nine recent approaches that range from the suborganismal to the ecosystem level. Although significant progress has been made in the field, no recent approach meets all 12 criteria. Given that the use of biomonitoring information has important financial consequences, we suggest that societies and governments prioritize how these criteria should be ranked.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Biodiversity regulates ecosystem predictability
McGrady-Steed, J., Harris, P. M., & Morin, P. J. (1997) · Nature · doi:10.1038/36561 · Cited by 720
Cited by
Environmental metabarcodes for insects: in silicoPCR reveals potential for taxonomic bias
Clarke, L. J., Soubrier, J., Weyrich, L. S., & Cooper, A. (2014) · Molecular Ecology Resources · doi:10.1111/1755-0998.12265 · Cited by 351
Jones, F. C. (2008) · Environmental Reviews · doi:10.1139/a07-010 · Cited by 300
Carew, M. E., Pettigrove, V. J., Metzeling, L., & Hoffmann, A. A. (2013) · Frontiers in Zoology · doi:10.1186/1742-9994-10-45 · Cited by 243
Dala‐Corte, R. B., Melo, A. S., Siqueira, T., Bini, L. M., Martins, R. T., Cunico, A. M., Pes, A. M., Magalhães, A. L. B., Godoy, B. S., Leal, C. G., et al. (2020) · Journal of Applied Ecology · doi:10.1111/1365-2664.13657 · Cited by 239
Expanding Ecological Assessment by Integrating Microorganisms into Routine Freshwater Biomonitoring
Sagova-Mareckova, M., Boenigk, J., Bouchez, A., Cermakova, K., Chonova, T., Cordier, T., Eisendle, U., Elersek, T., Fazi, S., Fleituch, T., et al. (2021) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2020.116767 · Cited by 232
Metadata
- Authors
- Bonada, N., Prat, N., Resh, V. H., & Statzner, B.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Entomology
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 2006-01-01
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 495-523
- ISSN
- 0066-4170 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-4487
- OpenAlex
- W2169484028
- Cited by
- 1,065
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 1.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: DEVELOPMENTS IN AQUATIC INSECT BIOMONITORING: A Comparative Analysis of Recent Approaches. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1146/annurev.ento.51.110104.151124
- The paper
- Bonada, N., Prat, N., Resh, V. H., & Statzner, B. (2006). DEVELOPMENTS IN AQUATIC INSECT BIOMONITORING: A Comparative Analysis of Recent Approaches. Annual Review of Entomology. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ento.51.110104.151124
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.