Interactions Between Mosquito Larvae and Species that Share the Same Trophic Level
Abstract
Ecological theory predicts, and empirical research shows, that species sharing the same trophic level as a target species (hereafter controphic species) can have large direct and indirect effects on the target species by sharing resources and/or by serving as alternative prey to predators. Yet, the roles of controphic species of mosquito larvae in affecting mosquito populations have received little attention. Published empirical evidence, although scarce, suggests that controphic species such as zooplankton and anuran larvae compete with mosquito larvae, can positively affect mosquito larvae by consuming bacteria that are pathogenic to mosquito larvae, reduce predation on mosquito larvae by serving as alternative prey, and ultimately cause increased predation on mosquito larvae by causing a numerical response in the predator. We conclude that more extensive theoretical and empirical studies in elucidating the roles of controphic species will better allow us to predict mosquito population dynamics and allow for better management of mosquitoes.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Desiccation and parasitism may have also mediated divergent selection because they are probably correlated with predation pressure.
“Desiccation and parasitism may have also mediated divergent selection because they are probably correlated with predation pressure as are other factors (Blaustein and Chase, 2007).”
From The molecular forms of Anopheles gambiae: a phenotypic perspective (2008) · cites this paper as Blaustein and Chase, 2007
Cites
A note on trophic complexity and community stability.
Paine, R. T. (1969) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/282586 · Cited by 1,796 · see citing works
Experimental evidence for alternative stable equilibria in a benthic pond food web
Chase, J. M. (2003) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1046/j.1461-0248.2003.00482.x · Cited by 159 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The molecular forms of Anopheles gambiae: a phenotypic perspective
Lehmann, T., & Diabate, A. (2008) · Infection, Genetics and Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.meegid.2008.06.003 · Cited by 177 · see citing works
Predation efficiency of Anopheles gambiae larvae by aquatic predators in western Kenya highlands
Kweka, E. J., Zhou, G., Gilbreath, T. M., Afrane, Y., Nyindo, M., Githeko, A. K., & Yan, G. (2011) · Parasites & Vectors · doi:10.1186/1756-3305-4-128 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
- Authors
- Blaustein, L., & Chase, J. M.
- Affiliations
- Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
- Washington University in St. Louis (US)
- Venue
- Annual Review of Entomology
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 2007-01-01
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 489-507
- ISSN
- 0066-4170 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-4487
- OpenAlex
- W2095540940
- Cited by
- 145
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 12
- FWCI
- 1.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Annual Review of Entomology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Monash University
- Israel Science Foundation
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Mosquito-borne diseases and control
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Mathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology Models
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Insect-Plant Interactions and Control
- Keywords
- mosquito larvae, trophic interactions, alternative prey, interspecific competition, zooplankton, tadpoles, mosquito population dynamics, mosquito control
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Competitive Behavior, Cyprinodontiformes, Larva, Culicidae, Oviposition, Population Dynamics, Predatory Behavior, Oryza, Symbiosis, Ecosystem
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review