Cited by 145Mosquito-borne diseases and controlMathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology ModelsInsect-Plant Interactions and Control

Interactions Between Mosquito Larvae and Species that Share the Same Trophic Level

Blaustein, Leon, Chase, Jonathan M.·2007·Annual Review of Entomology

Abstract

Ecological theory predicts, and empirical research shows, that species sharing the same trophic level as a target species (hereafter controphic species) can have large direct and indirect effects on the target species by sharing resources and/or by serving as alternative prey to predators. Yet, the roles of controphic species of mosquito larvae in affecting mosquito populations have received little attention. Published empirical evidence, although scarce, suggests that controphic species such as zooplankton and anuran larvae compete with mosquito larvae, can positively affect mosquito larvae by consuming bacteria that are pathogenic to mosquito larvae, reduce predation on mosquito larvae by serving as alternative prey, and ultimately cause increased predation on mosquito larvae by causing a numerical response in the predator. We conclude that more extensive theoretical and empirical studies in elucidating the roles of controphic species will better allow us to predict mosquito population dynamics and allow for better management of mosquitoes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev.ento.52.110405.091431

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Desiccation and parasitism may have also mediated divergent selection because they are probably correlated with predation pressure.

    “Desiccation and parasitism may have also mediated divergent selection because they are probably correlated with predation pressure as are other factors (Blaustein and Chase, 2007).”

    From The molecular forms of Anopheles gambiae: a phenotypic perspective (2008) · cites this paper as Blaustein and Chase, 2007

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Blaustein, L., & Chase, J. M.
Affiliations
  • Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
  • Washington University in St. Louis (US)
Venue
Annual Review of Entomology
Published
2007-01-01
Volume
52
Issue
1
Pages
489-507
ISSN
  • 0066-4170 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-4487
OpenAlex
W2095540940
Cited by
145
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 12
FWCI
1.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annual Review of Entomology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Monash University
  • Israel Science Foundation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Mosquito-borne diseases and control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Mathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology Models
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Insect-Plant Interactions and Control
Keywords
mosquito larvae, trophic interactions, alternative prey, interspecific competition, zooplankton, tadpoles, mosquito population dynamics, mosquito control
MeSH terms
Animals, Competitive Behavior, Cyprinodontiformes, Larva, Culicidae, Oviposition, Population Dynamics, Predatory Behavior, Oryza, Symbiosis, Ecosystem

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review