Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 548

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Ecology of Secondary Succession

Horn, Henry S.·1974·Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics

Abstract

Rather than review the ample and expanding literature of succession, as Drury & Nisbet (12) have lately and nobly done, I propose to cover some recent developments in population biology that have profound implications for theories and patterns of secondary succession. Much of the conventional wisdom of successional theory rests on biased definitions and hidden assumptions. So I begin by defining what I mean by succession, and stating why I limit my discussion to secondary succession. Succession is a pattern of changes in specific composition of a community after a radical disturbance or after the opening of a new patch in the physical environment for colonization by plants and animals. If the physical environment remains con­ stant, eventually the changes in the specific composition of the community become undetectably slow or cease altogether. This late stage of succession is dignified by the term climax. The climax is often idealized as a state of constant specific composition, though of course the species and their relative abundances fluctuate statistically and vary from place to place as the physical environment changes along more or less perceptible gradients. Thus I concur with the concept of climax proposed by Whittaker (49, 50), that is, a pattern of species' abundances, which, while locally constant, varies from place to place in a continuous fashion. Because population biology treats interactions between organisms, I limit my discussion to secondary succession, the process of reestablishment of a reasonable facsimile of the original community after a temporary disturbance. Secondary succession is usually a result of interspecific competition, with pioneer species often beating later species to openings and perhaps outcompeting them in openings as well, but themselves producing an environment in which later species are competitively superior. Hence I ignore at least that component of succession that is a direct response of one or more species to secular changes in the environment: primary succession (e.g. as a lake fills with silt or as bare rock weathers to mineral soi!), seasonal succession, and succes­ sions that track climatic changes over geological time. For a short, thorough, and constructive account of successional patterns see Whittaker's (54) book and its impending new edition. Odum (37, 38) concisely

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev.es.05.110174.000325

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Metadata

Authors
Horn, H. S.
Venue
Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics
Published
1974-11
Volume
5
Issue
1
Pages
25-37
ISSN
0066-4162 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2133420739
Cited by
548
References
0
FWCI
14.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Ecology of Secondary Succession. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1146/annurev.es.05.110174.000325
The paper
Horn, H. S. (1974). The Ecology of Secondary Succession. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.05.110174.000325

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.