Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 228

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Drosophila of Hawaii: Systematics and Ecological Genetics

Carson, Hampton L., Kaneshiro, Kenneth Y.·1976·Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics

Abstract

Mark Twain once said that Hawaii is ... the loveliest fleet of islands that lies anchored in any ocean. Poets, of course, are always right. Thus, the islands are indeed anchored; they occupy a fixed position near the middle of the vast Pacific crustal plate (50). The latter, however, is adrift on the earth's mantle, edging northwestward about nine centimeters each year. The islands have evidently been formed one after another as this plate has moved over a very hot melting spot in the mantle. These circumstances add enormously to the value of the islands as a natural laboratory for evolutionary events. Between five and six million years ago the island now called Kauai (Figure 1) rested near the present location of what is now the newest island (Hawaii, frequently called the Big Island). Each newer island rose successively above the ocean, a process that culminated in a chain of islands, all slowly drifting northwestwardly together (Figure 2). Indications suggest that the Hawaiian archipelago, or at least its present major islands, is now and always has been isolated by more than 3500 kilometers of unbroken ocean from any other continent or island group. The terrestial biota thus descended from waifs which originally crossed the ocean by long-distance dispersal (8). Chance has played a key role in determining what did and what did not arrive in Hawaii. Stochastic events, however, were not confined simply to the first arrivals. As each new island appeared to the southeast of Kauai, there arose a new set of opportunities for the repeated operation of chance colonization. In order to appreciate the extraordinary nature of the terrestrial ecology of Hawaii, some other basic facts should be borne in mind. The chance arrivals, coming from all points of the compass, produced a discordant biota (8). Natural selection

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev.es.07.110176.001523

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 228

Metadata

Authors
Carson, H. L., & Kaneshiro, K. Y.
Venue
Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics
Published
1976-11
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
311-345
ISSN
0066-4162 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2176426271
Cited by
228
References
1
FWCI
10.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Drosophila of Hawaii: Systematics and Ecological Genetics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1146/annurev.es.07.110176.001523
The paper
Carson, H. L., & Kaneshiro, K. Y. (1976). Drosophila of Hawaii: Systematics and Ecological Genetics. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.07.110176.001523

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.