The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Predator-Prey Theory and Variability
Abstract
Field ecologists are often impressed by the variability of ecological processes (26). In spite of this, mathematical models for predator-prey interactions have been mostly deterministic. Stochastic components are included simply by modifying a deterministic model-often with considerable arbitrariness. There has been a ten dency to regard stochasticity either as noise obscuring a deterministic signal or simply as a destabilizing influence. However, variability (stochasticity) plays a fun damental role in predator-prey population processes; it helps to explain observable population phenomena. In this review we explore ways in which deterministic models are inadequate and suggest some methods of modelling variability. Variability can be classified according to its origin into five categories. These different kinds of variability affect population dynamics in different ways. Especially interesting is the effect of variability in the presence of population subdivision-i.e. when the populations are not homogeneously interacting because movements are not unlimited. In this situation it can be shown that within-individual variation, or demographic stochasticity as it is usually called, does not have a vanishingly small effect as the population gets large. This is contrary to current opinion (41,57) based on models of populations that interact homogeneously. The idea of a structural model is introduced below. Such models make qualitative assumptions and are designed to allow different models to be compared within a single organizing framework. Structural models also yield qualitative predictions depending only on their qualitative assumptions and are therefore especially useful for testing ideas in ecology. Current modelling procedures place too great an empha sis on specific models. More general approaches are needed, which depend less on particular models. Stochastic systems require stochastic stability concepts. The idea of stochastic boundedness is an outgrowth of the concept of tightness of a class of probability measures. As a stability concept, stochastic boundedness seems more applicable to
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Swarms of Predators Exhibit "Preytaxis" if Individual Predators Use Area-Restricted Search
Kareiva, P., & Odell, G. (1987) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/284707 · Cited by 990
Biological Control in Theory and Practice
Murdoch, W. W., Chesson, J., & Chesson, P. L. (1985) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/284347 · Cited by 608
Self-citationCoexistence of plant species with similar niches
Shmida, A., & Ellner, S. (1984) · Vegetatio · doi:10.1007/bf00044894 · Cited by 513
Permanence via invasion graphs: incorporating community assembly into modern coexistence theory
Hofbauer, J., & Schreiber, S. J. (2022) · Journal of Mathematical Biology · doi:10.1007/s00285-022-01815-2 · Cited by 35
Metadata
- Authors
- Chesson, P.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 1978-11
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 323-347
- ISSN
- 0066-4162 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2097044247
- Cited by
- 213
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Predator-Prey Theory and Variability. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1146/annurev.es.09.110178.001543
- The paper
- Chesson, P. (1978). Predator-Prey Theory and Variability. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.09.110178.001543
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.