The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Traditional Marine Conservation Methods in Oceania and Their Demise
Abstract
Understanding a conservation system means understanding not only nature of what is being conserved, but also viewpoint of conserver. Knowledge of this second element is essential if we are to comprehend a system of resource management employed by a people whose perception of their environment differs from our own. Watt (83) has said that a prudent civilization should take seriously ideas of other civilizations about resource use. Over short term, he states, the ideas of civilization A might appear vastly superior to those of civilization B. But over long term it could turn out that apparently 'primitive' practices of civilization B were based on millenia of trial and error and incorporated deep wisdom that was unintelligible to civilization A.'' The following is an account of rise and decline of a millenia-old system of controlled exploitation of marine resources that incorporates a wisdom Westerners are only now beginning to appreciate after having brought about its widespread decay. The inhabitants of Oceania [defined here as islands of Polynesia (excluding New Zealand), Melanesia (excluding New Guinea), and Micronesia] traditionally obtained bulk of their protein from sea. They often had no alternative. Population densities commonly reached several hundred people per square mile and sometimes climbed to more than one thousand per square mile. On some islands land (often consisting of calcareous soil with little humus) barely supplied their vegetable needs. Terrestrial food supplies were not only limited, but also precarious. On many islands typhoons, droughts, and tsunamis periodically destroyed them. Warm, hu-
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Benefits beyond boundaries: the fishery effects of marine reserves
Gell, F. R., & Roberts, C. M. (2003) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/s0169-5347(03)00189-7 · Cited by 936
Model of a coral reef ecosystem: I. The ECOPATH model and its application to French Frigate Shoals
Polovina, J. J. (1984) · Coral Reefs · doi:10.1007/bf00306135 · Cited by 872
The Problem of Fit between Ecosystems and Institutions: Ten Years Later
Folke, C., Pritchard, Jr., Berkes, F., Colding, J., & Svedin, U. (2007) · Ecology and Society · doi:10.5751/es-02064-120130 · Cited by 710
Food taboos: their origins and purposes
Meyer-Rochow, V. B. (2009) · Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine · doi:10.1186/1746-4269-5-18 · Cited by 448
Thornton, T. F., & Scheer, A. M. (2012) · Ecology and Society · doi:10.5751/es-04714-170308 · Cited by 281
Metadata
- Authors
- Johannes, R. E.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 1978-11
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 349-364
- ISSN
- 0066-4162 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2180043963
- Cited by
- 740
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 18.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Traditional Marine Conservation Methods in Oceania and Their Demise. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1146/annurev.es.09.110178.002025
- The paper
- Johannes, R. E. (1978). Traditional Marine Conservation Methods in Oceania and Their Demise. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.09.110178.002025
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.