The DOI matches its Crossref record; 46 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Morphogenetic Constraints on Patterns of Carbon Distribution in Plants
Abstract
Phenotypic plasticity is an important element in the response repertoire of plants (25). It may be manifested as changes in organ (e.g. leaf) morphology as well as in patterns of biomass distribution. Morphological plasticity throughout growth is possible because plant development is modular in form (77, 184, 185). Growth results from the reiteration of basic morphological subunits produced by meristems. Because meristems may develop into either reproductive or vegetative structures, patterns of biomass distribution reflect developmental decisions (121, 172, 180). In this essay, we review data suggesting that at least in certain cases, architectural constraints affect the range of morphological plasticity that can be expressed. Because carbon is frequently viewed as a critical currency of allocation (76, 165), we focus on how these constraints influence assimilate (i.e. carbon) production and utilization. We postulate that when these constraints are present, plants consist not only of morphological subunits (185) but, as Adams (4) first suggested, of physiological subunits as well. We call these integrated physiological units (IPUs) and propose that they are made up of identifiable arrays of morphological subunits that together function as relatively autonomous structures with respect to the assimilation, distribution, and utilization of carbon. If such units of physiological integration exist,
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Harper, J. L. (1977) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 9,128
The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: a critique of the adaptationist programme
Gould, S. J., & Lewontin, R. C. (1979) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.1979.0086 · Cited by 7,770
Evolutionary Significance of Phenotypic Plasticity in Plants
Bradshaw, A. D. (1965) · Advances in Genetics · doi:10.1016/s0065-2660(08)60048-6 · Cited by 3,124
Charnov, E. L. (1982) · PubMed · Cited by 2,886
Flower and Fruit Abortion: Proximate Causes and Ultimate Functions
Stephenson, A. G. (1981) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.es.12.110181.001345 · Cited by 1,822
Jarvis, P. G., Kramer, P. J., & Kozlowski, T. T. (1983) · The Journal of Applied Ecology · doi:10.2307/2403413 · Cited by 1,794
Evolution in age-structured populations
(1995) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.32-3873 · Cited by 1,740
Hallé, F., Oldeman, R. A. A., & Tomlinson, P. B. (1978) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-81190-6 · Cited by 1,437
Tropical Trees and Forests. An Architectural Analysis.
Dransfield, J., Halle, F., Oldeman, R. A. A., & Tomlinson, P. B. (1980) · The Journal of Ecology · doi:10.2307/2259284 · Cited by 1,311
The Evolution of Life History Traits: A Critique of the Theory and a Review of the Data
Stearns, S. C. (1977) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.es.08.110177.001045 · Cited by 1,141
Cited by
The Dilemma of Plants: To Grow or Defend
Herms, D. A., & Mattson, W. J. (1992) · The Quarterly Review of Biology · doi:10.1086/417659 · Cited by 4,262
Phenological Patterns of Terrestrial Plants
Rathcke, B., & Lacey, E. P. (1985) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.es.16.110185.001143 · Cited by 1,507
The costs of reproduction in plants
Obeso, J. R. (2002) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1046/j.1469-8137.2002.00477.x · Cited by 1,377
Terrestrial plant tolerance to herbivory
Rosenthal, J. P., & Kotanen, P. M. (1994) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/0169-5347(94)90180-5 · Cited by 579
The Theory and Practice of Branch Autonomy
Sprugel, D. G., Hinckley, T. M., & Schaap, W. (1991) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.es.22.110191.001521 · Cited by 481
Metadata
- Authors
- Watson, M. A., & Casper, B. B.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 1984-11
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 233-258
- ISSN
- 0066-4162 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2144742303
- Cited by
- 638
- References
- 46
- FWCI
- 23.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Morphogenetic Constraints on Patterns of Carbon Distribution in Plants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1146/annurev.es.15.110184.001313
- The paper
- Watson, M. A., & Casper, B. B. (1984). Morphogenetic Constraints on Patterns of Carbon Distribution in Plants. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.15.110184.001313
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.