The DOI matches its Crossref record.
COOPERATION AND CONFLICT IN THE EVOLUTION OF SIGNAL INTERACTIONS
Open accessAbstract
Various invertebrate and vertebrate species in which males produce acoustic or bioluminescent signals for long-range sexual advertisement exhibit collective patterns of temporal signal interactions.These patterns range from simple concentrations of signaling during a narrow diel interval to synchronous and alternating interactions entailing precisely timed phase relationships between neighboring individuals.Signals involved in synchrony and alternation are generally produced with rhythms that are under the control of central nervous oscillators.Neighboring individuals effect these interactions via mutual phase delays or phase advances of their oscillators or actual changes in the free-running periods of their oscillators.Both synchrony and alternation may represent adaptations to avoid spiteful behavior or to maximize the ability of a local group to attract females or evade natural enemies.Alternatively, these collective patterns may represent incidental outcomes of competition between males jamming each other's signals.The neural mechanisms that effect signal jamming can be selected for by critical psychophysical factors such as precedence effects.Additional competitive pressures that may generate synchrony, alternation, and other collective patterns of signal interaction include mutual assessment of rivals, evasion of detection by dominant individuals, disruption of communication within courting pairs, and narrowness of the time intervals during which receptive females are present.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
What is soundscape ecology? An introduction and overview of an emerging new science
Pijanowski, B. C., Farina, A., Gage, S. H., Dumyahn, S. L., & Krause, B. L. (2011) · Landscape Ecology · doi:10.1007/s10980-011-9600-8 · Cited by 730
VARIATION IN MATE CHOICE AND MATING PREFERENCES: A REVIEW OF CAUSES AND CONSEQUENCES
JENNIONS, M. D., & PETRIE, M. (1997) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1469-185x.1997.tb00015.x · Cited by 459
How is female mate choice affected by male competition?
Wong, B. B. M., & Candolin, U. (2005) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1017/s1464793105006809 · Cited by 455
On the role and origin of isochrony in human rhythmic entrainment
Merker, B. H., Madison, G. S., & Eckerdal, P. (2009) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2008.06.011 · Cited by 326
Implications for marine mammals of large-scale changes in the marine acoustic environment
Tyack, P. L. (2008) · Journal of Mammalogy · doi:10.1644/07-mamm-s-307r.1 · Cited by 320
Metadata
- Authors
- Greenfield, M. D.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 1994-11
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 97-126
- ISSN
- 0066-4162 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2127408955
- Cited by
- 244
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: COOPERATION AND CONFLICT IN THE EVOLUTION OF SIGNAL INTERACTIONS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1146/annurev.es.25.110194.000525
- The paper
- Greenfield, M. D. (1994). COOPERATION AND CONFLICT IN THE EVOLUTION OF SIGNAL INTERACTIONS. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.25.110194.000525
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.