The DOI matches its Crossref record; 96 of the 96 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
How is female mate choice affected by male competition?
Abstract
The plethora of studies devoted to the topics of male competition and female mate choice belie the fact that their interaction remains poorly understood. Indeed, on the question of whether competition should help or hinder the choice process, opinions scattered throughout the sexual selection literature seem unnecessarily polarised. We argue, in the light of recent theoretical and empirical advances, that the effect of competition on mate choice depends on whether it results in the choosy sex attaining high breeding value for total fitness, considering both direct and indirect fitness benefits. Specifically, trade‐offs may occur between different fitness benefits if some are correlated with male competitive ability whilst others are not. Moreover, the costs and benefits of mating with competitive males may vary in time and/or space. These considerations highlight the importance of injecting a life‐history perspective into sexual selection studies. Within this context, we turn to the sexual selection literature to try to offer insights into the circumstances when competition might be expected to have positive or negative implications for pre‐copulatory female choice. In this regard, we elaborate on three stages where competition might impact upon the choice process: (i) during mate detection, (ii) mate evaluation, and (iii) in dictating actual mating outcomes. We conclude by offering researchers several potentially rewarding avenues for future research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mate selection—A selection for a handicap
Zahavi, A. (1975) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1016/0022-5193(75)90111-3 · Cited by 5,251
Extra pair paternity in birds: a review of interspecific variation and adaptive function
Griffith, S. C., Owens, I. P. F., & Thuman, K. A. (2002) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-294x.2002.01613.x · Cited by 1,424
Cost of mating in Drosophila melanogaster females is mediated by male accessory gland products
Chapman, T., Liddle, L. F., Kalb, J. M., Wolfner, M. F., & Partridge, L. (1995) · Nature · doi:10.1038/373241a0 · Cited by 1,393
Sperm competition and its evolutionary consequences in the insects
(2002) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.39-5192 · Cited by 1,311
Sperm Competition and Sexual Selection
Stockley, P. (1999) · Heredity · doi:10.1038/sj.hdy.6885353 · Cited by 1,092
Zahavi, A. (1977) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1016/0022-5193(77)90061-3 · Cited by 1,000
Sex, Color, and Mate Choice in Guppies
Houde, A. (1998) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9780691207261 · Cited by 951
The evolution of mate choice and mating biases
Kokko, H., Brooks, R., Jennions, M. D., & Morley, J. (2003) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2002.2235 · Cited by 927
Sperm Competition and Its Evolutionary Consequences in the Insects
Simmons, L. W. (2002) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9780691207032 · Cited by 799
Armaments and ornaments: an evolutionary explanation of traits of dual utility
Berglund, A., Bisazza, A., & Pilastro, A. (1996) · Biological Journal of the Linnean Society · doi:10.1006/bijl.1996.0043 · Cited by 776
Cited by
Reproductive Interference Between Animal Species
Gröning, J., & Hochkirch, A. (2008) · The Quarterly Review of Biology · doi:10.1086/590510 · Cited by 594
(2008) · UST Research Online (University of St. Thomas - Minnesota) · Cited by 118
Female chemical signalling underlying reproduction in mammals
Coombes, H. A., Stockley, P., & Hurst, J. L. (2018) · Journal of Chemical Ecology · doi:10.1007/s10886-018-0981-x · Cited by 98
Yokoi, S., Ansai, S., Kinoshita, M., Naruse, K., Kamei, Y., Young, L. J., Okuyama, T., & Takeuchi, H. (2016) · Frontiers in Zoology · doi:10.1186/s12983-016-0152-2 · Cited by 49
Metadata
- Authors
- Wong, B. B. M., & Candolin, U.
- Venue
- Biological Reviews
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-11
- Volume
- 80
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 559-571
- ISSN
- 0006-3231 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-7931
- 1469-185X
- OpenAlex
- W2101249840
- Cited by
- 455
- References
- 96
- FWCI
- 2.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: How is female mate choice affected by male competition? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s1464793105006809
- The paper
- Wong, B. B. M., & Candolin, U. (2005). How is female mate choice affected by male competition? Biological Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1464793105006809
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.