The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
MANAGING NORTH AMERICAN WATERFOWL IN THE FACE OF UNCERTAINTY
Abstract
Informed management of waterfowl (or any animal population) requires management goals and objectives, the ability to implement management actions, periodic information about population and goal-related variables, and knowledge of effects of management actions on population and goal-related variables. In North America, international treaties mandate a primary objective of protecting migratory bird populations, with a secondary objective of providing hunting opportunity in a manner compatible with such protection. Through the years, annual establishment of hunting regulations and acquisition and management of habitat have been the primary management actions taken by federal agencies. Various information-gathering programs were established and, by the 1960s, had developed into arguably the best monitoring system in the world for continentally distributed animal populations. Retrospective analyses using estimates from this monitoring system have been used to investigate effects of management actions on waterfowl population and harvest dynamics, but key relationships are still characterized by uncertainty. We recommend actively adaptive management as an approach that can meet short-term harvest objectives, while reducing uncertainty and ensuring sustainable populations over the long-term.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Markov decision processes: Discrete stochastic dynamic programming
Hazeghi, K., & Puterman, M. L. (1995) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2291177 · Cited by 8,037
Fisher, R. A. (1936) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.1.3923.554-a · Cited by 4,980
Quantitative Fisheries Stock Assessment
Hilborn, R., & Walters, C. J. (1992) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-3598-0 · Cited by 3,068
Cited by
Monitoring of biological diversity in space and time
Yoccoz, N. G., Nichols, J. D., & Boulinier, T. (2001) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/s0169-5347(01)02205-4 · Cited by 1,432
Self-citationNICHOLS, J., & WILLIAMS, B. (2006) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2006.08.007 · Cited by 1,104
Self-citationCamera Traps in Animal Ecology
(2011) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-4-431-99495-4 · Cited by 759
Large scale wildlife monitoring studies: statistical methods for design and analysis
Pollock, K. H., Nichols, J. D., Simons, T. R., Farnsworth, G. L., Bailey, L. L., & Sauer, J. R. (2002) · Environmetrics · doi:10.1002/env.514 · Cited by 684
Self-citationIndicators of ecological change: new tools for managing populations of large herbivores
MORELLET, N., GAILLARD, J., HEWISON, A. J. M., BALLON, P., BOSCARDIN, Y., DUNCAN, P., KLEIN, F., & MAILLARD, D. (2007) · Journal of Applied Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2007.01307.x · Cited by 290
Metadata
- Authors
- Nichols, J. D., Johnson, F. A., & Williams, B. K.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 1995-11
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 177-199
- ISSN
- 0066-4162 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2113910970
- Cited by
- 261
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 3.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: MANAGING NORTH AMERICAN WATERFOWL IN THE FACE OF UNCERTAINTY. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1146/annurev.es.26.110195.001141
- The paper
- Nichols, J. D., Johnson, F. A., & Williams, B. K. (1995). MANAGING NORTH AMERICAN WATERFOWL IN THE FACE OF UNCERTAINTY. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.26.110195.001141
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.