The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Turbulence in Plant Canopies
Abstract
▪ Abstract The single-point statistics of turbulence in the ‘roughness sub-layer’ occupied by the plant canopy and the air layer just above it differ significantly from those in the surface layer. The mean velocity profile is inflected, second moments are strongly inhomogeneous with height, skewnesses are large, and second-moment budgets are far from local equilibrium. Velocity moments scale with single length and time scales throughout the layer rather than depending on height. Large coherent structures control turbulence dynamics. Sweeps rather than ejections dominate eddy fluxes and a typical large eddy consists of a pair of counter-rotating streamwise vortices, the downdraft between the vortex pair generating the sweep. Comparison with the statistics and instability modes of the plane mixing layer shows that the latter rather than the boundary layer is the appropriate model for canopy flow and that the dominant large eddies are the result of an inviscid instability of the inflected mean velocity profile. Aerodynamic drag on the foliage is the cause both of the unstable inflected velocity profile and of a ‘spectral short cut’ mechanism that removes energy from large eddies and diverts it to fine scales, where it is rapidly dissipated, bypassing the inertial eddy-cascade. Total dissipation rates are very large in the canopy as a result of the fine-scale shear layers that develop around the foliage.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Energy Cascade in Large-Eddy Simulations of Turbulent Fluid Flows
Leonard, A. (1975) · Advances in Geophysics · doi:10.1016/s0065-2687(08)60464-1 · Cited by 1,121
Cited by
Footprint modeling for vegetation atmosphere exchange studies: a review and perspective
Schmid, H. P. (2002) · Agricultural and Forest Meteorology · doi:10.1016/s0168-1923(02)00107-7 · Cited by 507
Laboratory Investigation of Mean Drag in a Random Array of Rigid, Emergent Cylinders
Tanino, Y., & Nepf, H. M. (2008) · Journal of Hydraulic Engineering · doi:10.1061/(asce)0733-9429(2008)134:1(34 · Cited by 490
A multi-site analysis of random error in tower-based measurements of carbon and energy fluxes
Richardson, A. D., Hollinger, D. Y., Burba, G. G., Davis, K. J., Flanagan, L. B., Katul, G. G., William Munger, J., Ricciuto, D. M., Stoy, P. C., Suyker, A. E., et al. (2006) · Agricultural and Forest Meteorology · doi:10.1016/j.agrformet.2006.01.007 · Cited by 465
Turburence structure and coherent motion in vegetated canopy open-channel flows
Nezu, I., & Sanjou, M. (2008) · Journal of Hydro-environment Research · doi:10.1016/j.jher.2008.05.003 · Cited by 262
Wind sheltering of a lake by a tree canopy or bluff topography
Markfort, C. D., Perez, A. L. S., Thill, J. W., Jaster, D. A., Porté‐Agel, F., & Stefan, H. G. (2010) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1029/2009wr007759 · Cited by 123
Metadata
- Authors
- Finnigan, J.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 2000-01
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 519-571
- ISSN
- 0066-4189 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-4479
- OpenAlex
- W2122759485
- Cited by
- 1,596
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 1.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Turbulence in Plant Canopies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1146/annurev.fluid.32.1.519
- The paper
- Finnigan, J. (2000). Turbulence in Plant Canopies. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.fluid.32.1.519
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.