The DOI matches its Crossref record.
CONSERVATION GENETICS
Abstract
Inbreeding depression, accumulation and loss of deleterious mutations, loss of genetic variation in small populations, genetic adaptation to captivity and its effect on reintroduction success, and outbreeding depression are reviewed. The impact of genetic factors in endangerment and extinction has been underestimated in some recent publications. Inbreeding depression in wildlife and in the field has been clearly established, while its impact has been greatly underestimated. The size of populations where genetic factors become important is higher than previously recognized, as Ne/N ratios average 0.11. Purging effects have been overestimated as a mechanism for eliminating deleterious alleles in small populations. The impact of loss of genetic variation in increasing the susceptibility of populations to environmental stochasticity and catastrophes has generally been ignored. Consequently, extinctions are often attributed to "nongenetic" factors when these may have interacted with genetic factors to cause extinction.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Male-male competition magnifies inbreeding depression in wild house mice.
Meagher, S., Penn, D. J., & Potts, W. K. (2000) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.97.7.3324 · Cited by 322
Human influences on evolution, and the ecological and societal consequences
Hendry, A. P., Gotanda, K. M., & Svensson, E. I. (2017) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2016.0028 · Cited by 298
Conservation genetics of population bottlenecks: the role of chance, selection, and history
Bouzat, J. L. (2010) · Conservation Genetics · doi:10.1007/s10592-010-0049-0 · Cited by 289
The Effects of a Bottleneck on Inbreeding Depression and the Genetic Load
Kirkpatrick, M., & Jarne, P. (2000) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/303312 · Cited by 271
Genetic diversity, inbreeding and breeding practices in dogs: Results from pedigree analyses
Leroy, G. (2011) · The Veterinary Journal · doi:10.1016/j.tvjl.2011.06.016 · Cited by 143
Genetic characterization of populations of the golden jackal and the red fox in Israel
Magory Cohen, T., King, R., Dolev, A., Boldo, A., Lichter-Peled, A., & Kahila Bar-Gal, G. (2013) · Conservation Genetics · doi:10.1007/s10592-012-0423-1 · Cited by 46
Reconstruction of the colonization of southern Madagascar by introduced Rattus rattus
Hingston, M., Goodman, S. M., Ganzhorn, J. U., & Sommer, S. (2005) · Journal of Biogeography · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2699.2005.01311.x · Cited by 38
Pedigree analysis for the genetic management of group-living species
Jiménez‐Mena, B., Schad, K., Hanna, N., & Lacy, R. C. (2016) · Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1002/ece3.1831 · Cited by 24
Conservation corridors affect the fixation of novel alleles
Orrock, J. L. (2006) · Conservation Genetics · doi:10.1007/s10592-005-9016-6 · Cited by 19
Metadata
- Authors
- Frankham, R.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Genetics
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 1995-12
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 305-327
- ISSN
- 0066-4197 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-2948
- OpenAlex
- W4246640010
- Cited by
- 1,050
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
