The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Estimating F-Statistics
Abstract
▪ Abstract A moment estimator of θ, the coancestry coefficient for alleles within a population, was described by Weir & Cockerham in 1984 ( 100 ) and is still widely cited. The estimate is used by population geneticists to characterize population structure, by ecologists to estimate migration rates, by animal breeders to describe genetic variation, and by forensic scientists to quantify the strength of matching DNA profiles. This review extends the work of Weir & Cockerham by allowing different levels of coancestry for different populations, and by allowing non-zero coancestries between pairs of populations. All estimates are relative to the average value of θ between pairs of populations. Moment estimates for within- and between-population θ values are likely to have large sampling variances, although these may be reduced by combining information over loci. Variances also decrease with the numbers of alleles at a locus, and with the numbers of populations sampled. This review also extends the work of Weir & Cockerham by employing maximum likelihood methods under the assumption that allele frequencies follow the normal distribution over populations. For the case of equal θ values within populations and zero θ values between populations, the maximum likelihood estimate is the same as that given by Robertson & Hill in 1984 ( 70 ). The review concludes by relating functions of θ values to times of population divergence under a pure drift model.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Wondji, C., Simard, F., & Fontenille, D. (2002) · Insect Molecular Biology · doi:10.1046/j.0962-1075.2001.00306.x · Cited by 142
Cited by
Inference of population splits and mixtures from genome-wide allele frequency data
Pickrell, J. K., & Pritchard, J. K. (2012) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1002967 · Cited by 2,731
Population genomics of Bronze Age Eurasia
Allentoft, M. E., Sikora, M., Sjögren, K.-G., Rasmussen, S., Rasmussen, M., Stenderup, J., Damgaard, P. B., Schroeder, H., Ahlström, T., Vinner, L., et al. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14507 · Cited by 1,550
Myeloid sarcoma: clinico-pathologic, phenotypic and cytogenetic analysis of 92 adult patients
Pileri, S. A., Ascani, S., Cox, M. C., Campidelli, C., Bacci, F., Piccioli, M., Piccaluga, P. P., Agostinelli, C., Asioli, S., Novero, D., et al. (2007) · Leukemia · doi:10.1038/sj.leu.2404491 · Cited by 720
Using Environmental Correlations to Identify Loci Underlying Local Adaptation
Coop, G., Witonsky, D., Di Rienzo, A., & Pritchard, J. K. (2010) · Genetics · doi:10.1534/genetics.110.114819 · Cited by 709
Estimating and interpreting F ST : The impact of rare variants
Bhatia, G., Patterson, N., Sankararaman, S., & Price, A. L. (2013) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.154831.113 · Cited by 612
Metadata
- Authors
- Weir, B. S., & Hill, W. G.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Genetics
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 2002-12
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 721-750
- ISSN
- 0066-4197 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-2948
- OpenAlex
- W2097076008
- Cited by
- 648
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 1.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Estimating F-Statistics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1146/annurev.genet.36.050802.093940
- The paper
- Weir, B. S., & Hill, W. G. (2002). Estimating F-Statistics. Annual Review of Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.genet.36.050802.093940
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.