The DOI matches its Crossref record.
IMMUNODOMINANCE IN MAJOR HISTOCOMPATIBILITY COMPLEX CLASS I–RESTRICTED T LYMPHOCYTE RESPONSES
Abstract
▪ Abstract Of the many thousands of peptides encoded by a complex foreign antigen that can potentially be presented to CD8+ T cells (T CD8+), only a small fraction induce measurable responses in association with any given major histocompatibility complex class I allele. To design vaccines that elicit optimal T CD8+responses, a thorough understanding of this phenomenon, known as immunodominance, is imperative. Here we review recent progress in unraveling the molecular and cellular basis for immunodominance. Of foremost importance is peptide binding to class I molecules; only ∼1/200 of potential determinants bind at greater than the threshold affinity (K d> 500 nM) associated with immunogenicity. Limitations in the T CD8+repertoire render approximately half of these peptides nonimmunogenic, and inefficient antigen processing further thins the ranks by approximately four fifths. As a result, only ∼1/2000 of the peptides in a foreign antigen expressed by an appropriate antigen presenting cell achieve immunodominant status with a given class I allele. A roughly equal fraction of peptides have subdominant status, i.e. they induce weak-to-nondetectable primary T CD8+responses in the context of their natural antigen. Subdominant determinants may be expressed at or above levels of immunodominant determinants, at least on antigen presenting cells in vitro. The immunogenicity of subdominant determinants is often limited by immunodomination: suppression mediated by T CD8+specific for immunodominant determinants. Immunodomination is a central feature of T CD8+responses, as it even occurs among clones responding to the same immunodominant determinant. Little is known about how immunodominant and subdominant determinants are distinguished by the T CD8+repertoire, or how (and why) immunodomination occurs, but new tools are available to address these questions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The evolving landscape of biomarkers for checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy
Havel, J. J., Chowell, D., & Chan, T. A. (2019) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/s41568-019-0116-x · Cited by 2,286
Klein, J., & Sato, A. (2000) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm200009073431006 · Cited by 906
Exhaustion of tumor-specific CD8+ T cells in metastases from melanoma patients
Baitsch, L., Baumgaertner, P., Devêvre, E., Raghav, S. K., Legat, A., Barba, L., Wieckowski, S., Bouzourene, H., Deplancke, B., Romero, P., et al. (2011) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci46102 · Cited by 845
Cellular responses to viral infection in humans: lessons from Epstein–Barr virus
Hislop, A. D., Taylor, G. S., Sauce, D., & Rickinson, A. B. (2007) · Annual Review of Immunology · doi:10.1146/annurev.immunol.25.022106.141553 · Cited by 766
Schumacher, T. N., Scheper, W., & Kvistborg, P. (2019) · Annual Review of Immunology · doi:10.1146/annurev-immunol-042617-053402 · Cited by 574
Metadata
- Authors
- Yewdell, J. W., & Bennink, J. R.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Immunology
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 1999-04
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 51-88
- ISSN
- 0732-0582 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-3278
- OpenAlex
- W2097398162
- Cited by
- 944
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: IMMUNODOMINANCE IN MAJOR HISTOCOMPATIBILITY COMPLEX CLASS I–RESTRICTED T LYMPHOCYTE RESPONSES. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1146/annurev.immunol.17.1.51
- The paper
- Yewdell, J. W., & Bennink, J. R. (1999). IMMUNODOMINANCE IN MAJOR HISTOCOMPATIBILITY COMPLEX CLASS I–RESTRICTED T LYMPHOCYTE RESPONSES. Annual Review of Immunology. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.immunol.17.1.51
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.