The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Genes of the Major Histocompatibility Complex of the Mouse
Abstract
In the past 2 years our understanding of the major histocompatibility complex has advanced dramatically because of the rapid progress made by molecular genetics. Biologists can now begin to dissect the molecular nature of one of the most fundamental problems in eukaryotic biology-the ability of organisms to discriminate between self and nonself. Even the most primi tive of metazoa, the sponges, exhibit cell-surface recognition systems capa ble of identifying and destroying nonself, presumably to preserve the integrity of individuals growing in densely populated environments (34). For example, when two genetically identical sponges are apposed, the indi viduals fuse to form a single organism. However, when two genetically dissimilar sponges are joined, there is a reaction leading to tissue destruction at the boundary between the two individuals (35, 36). Presumably, cell surface structures recognize nonself and trigger effector mechanisms that lead to the destruction of the foreign tissue. Perhaps the most striking feature of the molecules involved in these cell-surface recognition phenom ena is their enormous diversity or polymorphism. More than 900 genetically distinct sponges have the capacity to reject one another after apposition (35). Self/nonself recognition systems in other invertebrates and vertebrates appear to display similar characteristics. Thus, three features are fundamen tal to self/nonself recognition systems-cell-surface recognition structures, effector mechanisms that lead to the destruction of nonself, and a high degree of polymorphism in the recognition structures. Mammals have self/nonself recognition systems encoded by a chromoso mal region termed the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) with pre-
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
T-cell antigen receptor genes and T-cell recognition
Davis, M. M., & Bjorkman, P. J. (1988) · Nature · doi:10.1038/334395a0 · Cited by 3,202
The human LDL receptor: A cysteine-rich protein with multiple Alu sequences in its mRNA
Yamamoto, T., Davis, C. G., Brown, M. S., Schneider, W. J., Casey, M. L., Goldstein, J. L., & Russell, D. W. (1984) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(84)90188-0 · Cited by 1,382
The class II molecules of the human and murine major histocompatibility complex
KAUFMAN, J., AUFFRAY, C., KORMAN, A., SHACKELFORD, D., & STROMINGER, J. (1984) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(84)90068-0 · Cited by 667
Higashi, Y., Yoshioka, H., Yamane, M., Gotoh, O., & Fujii-Kuriyama, Y. (1986) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.83.9.2841 · Cited by 555
Diversity of the Immunoglobulin Gene Superfamily
Hunkapiller, T., & Hood, L. (1989) · Advances in Immunology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2776(08)60639-2 · Cited by 290
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Hood, L., Steinmetz, M., & Malissen, B.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Immunology
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 1983-04
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 529-568
- ISSN
- 0732-0582 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-3278
- OpenAlex
- W2011275780
- Cited by
- 431
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 28.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Genes of the Major Histocompatibility Complex of the Mouse. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1146/annurev.iy.01.040183.002525
- The paper
- Hood, L., Steinmetz, M., & Malissen, B. (1983). Genes of the Major Histocompatibility Complex of the Mouse. Annual Review of Immunology. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.iy.01.040183.002525
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.