The Expanding Purview of Cultural Properties and Their Politics
Abstract
Cultural property is a field of law and politics that has expanded dramatically in the past two decades. The review explores the international legal, political, economic, and technological terrain in which possessive relations to cultural forms have been articulated and incited, as well as the revitalization of human rights claims premised upon cultural grounds. Changing practices, behaviors, attitudes, and protocols regarding cultural heritage both index and reflect transformations in social relationships that are indicative of larger patterns of late modernity and decolonization. This premise is illustrated through considerations of changing practices in cultural heritage preservation, archaeological and curatorial relationships to indigenous heritage properties, development institutions and programs, uses of intellectual property, and the treatment of traditional knowledge and traditional cultural expression. A new body of negotiated proprieties is emerging in a space of unprecedented legal pluralism that constitutes a significant area for sociolegal inquiry.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Framing intangible cultural heritage as part of the common heritage of humankind can take away governance, ownership and control by indigenous peoples in the name of humanity.
“Framing intangible cultural heritage as part of the common heritage of humankind can take away governance, ownership and control by indigenous peoples in the name of humanity (Coombe 2009).”
From Culture, law, risk and governance: contexts of traditional knowledge in climate change adaptation (2013) · cites this paper as Coombe 2009
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Culture, law, risk and governance: contexts of traditional knowledge in climate change adaptation
Williams, T., & Hardison, P. (2013) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-013-0850-0 · Cited by 180 · see citing works
Culture, law, risk and governance: contexts of traditional knowledge in climate change adaptation
Williams, T., & Hardison, P. (2013) · Climate Change and Indigenous Peoples in the United States · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-05266-3_3 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
- Authors
- Coombe, R. J.
- Affiliations
- York University (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Coombe, Rosemary J.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Law and Social Science
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 2009-12-01
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 393-412
- ISSN
- 1550-3585 (ISSN-L)
- 1550-3631
- OpenAlex
- W2133774763
- Cited by
- 90
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 11 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 5.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Annual Review of Law and Social Science (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation
- Social Sciences › Law › Indigenous Peoples' Rights and Law
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Cultural Identity and Heritage
- Keywords
- cultural property, cultural heritage, indigenous heritage, intellectual property, traditional knowledge, traditional cultural expressions, human rights, decolonization, legal pluralism, cultural heritage preservation, curatorial practice, development institutions, late modernity, cultural politics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review