CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 327Criminal Justice and Corrections AnalysisCriminal Justice and PenologyCriminal Law and Policy

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 115 of the 115 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Punishment Beyond the Legal Offender

Open access
Comfort, Megan·2007·Annual Review of Law and Social Science
DOI 10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.3.081806.112829
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

In the United States, lawbreakers are treated as social isolates, and the sentences imposed upon them are conceived of as affecting a discrete individual. However, people who commit or are suspected of committing crimes are generally embedded in kinship webs and social networks that draw others into the ambit of the state's punishment apparatus. Through their association with someone convicted of a crime, legally innocent people have firsthand and often intense contact with criminal justice authorities and correctional facilities, they experience variants of the direct and indirect consequences of incarceration, and they are confronted by the paradox of a penal state that has become the primary distributor of social services for the poor in the United States. Collectively, studies investigating punishment beyond the offender contribute to the understanding of the wide and multi-faceted impact of punitive sanctions and spotlight the importance of considering this full range of repercussions when evaluating the scope of the nation's policing, judicial, and correctional policies.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.3.081806.112829

Cites

115 of 115 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 113 references

Research works printed but not linked: 41

  1. Bakker LK, 1978, Soc. Work, 23, 143
  2. Bandele A, 1999, The Prisoner's Wife: A Memoir.
  3. Barry E, Ginchild R, Lee D. 1995. Legal issues for prisoners with children. See Gabel & Johnston 1995, pp.147–66
  4. Bloodgood R, 1928, Welfare of prisoners’ families in Kentucky
  5. Bloom B. 1995a. Imprisoned mothers. See Gabel & Johnston 1995, pp.21–30
  6. Bloom B. 1995b. Public policy and the children of incarcerated parents. See Gabel & Johnston 1995, pp.271–84
  7. Cadora E, Swartz C, Gordon M. 2003. Criminal justice and health and human services: an exploration of overlapping needs, resources, and interests in Brooklyn neighborhoods. See Travis & Waul 2003, pp.285–311
  8. Clear TR. 2002. The problem with “addition by subtraction”: the prison-crime relationship in low-income communities. See Mauer & Chesney-Lind 2002, pp.181–93
  9. Clemmer D, 1958, The Prison Community.
  10. Edin K, Nelson TJ, Paranal R. 2004. Fatherhood and incarceration as potential turning points in the criminal careers of unskilled men. See Pattillo et al. 2004, pp.46–75
  11. Farmer P. 2002. The house of the dead: tuberculosis and incarceration. See Mauer & Chesney-Lind 2002, pp.239–57
  12. FBI., 2005, Uniform Crime Reports: Crime in the United States
  13. Gabel K, 1995, Children of Incarcerated Parents
  14. Gonnerman J, 2004, Life on the Outside: The Prison Odyssey of Elaine Bartlett.
  15. Hairston CF, 1996, Fathers in prison and their children: visiting policy guidelines
  16. Hairston CF, 1998, Child Welfare, 77, 617
  17. Hammett T, 2006, Am. J. Public Health, 96, 13
  18. Hannon G, 1984, Fam. Therapy, 11, 253
  19. Jafari S. 2004. Settlement requires prison to revise care for HIV inmates.Associated Press,May 27
  20. Johnston D. 1995a. The care and placement of prisoners’ children. See Gabel & Johnston 1995, pp.103–23
  21. Johnston D. 1995b. Effects of parental incarceration. See Gabel & Johnston 1995, pp.59–88
  22. Johnston D. 1995c. Parent-child visitation in the jail or prison. See Gabel & Johnston 1995, pp.135–45
  23. Jorgensen JD, 1986, Fed. Probat., 50, 47
  24. Kampfner CJ. 1995. Post-traumatic stress reactions of children of imprisoned mothers. See Gabel & Johnston 1995, pp.59–88
  25. Kaplan T, 1994, Children and Violence, 51
  26. Lynch JP, Sabol WJ. 2004. Effects of incarceration on informal social control in communities. See Pattillo et al. 2004, pp.135–64
  27. McCosh J. 2001. Costs of state prisoners’ collect calls soaring.Atlanta Journal-Constitution, Oct. 18, p. 1D
  28. McDermott K, 1992, Prisoners’ Children: What Are the Issues, 50
  29. Mele C. 2005. The civil threat of eviction and the regulation and control of U.S. public housing communities. See Mele & Miller, pp.121–38
  30. Morris P, 1965, Prisoners and Their Families
  31. Norman JA. 1995. Children of prisoners in foster care. See Gabel & Johnston 1995, pp.124–34
  32. Nurse AM. 2004. Returning to strangers: newly paroled young fathers and their children. See Pattillo et al. 2004, pp.76–96
  33. Parke RD, Clarke-Stewart KA. 2003. The effects of parental incarceration on children: perspectives, promises, and policies. See Travis & Waul 2003, pp.189–232
  34. Reiterman T. 2004. Scathing report on prison doctors: a panel of experts ordered by court to review state system calls physician quality “seriously deficient.”Los Angeles Times, Aug. 11, p. B1
  35. Rose DR, Clear TR. 2003. Incarceration, reentry, and social capital: social networks in the balance. See Travis & Waul 2003, pp.313–41
  36. Ross D, 1998, Mod. Pathol., 11, 1127
  37. Sacks J. 1938.The social and economic adjustments of the families of a selected group of imprisoned felons. Masters thesis, Catholic Univ. Am., Natl. Catholic Sch. Soc. Serv., Washington, DC
  38. Smith B, 1994, Children on Hold: Improving the Response to Children Whose Parents Are Arrested and Incarcerated
  39. Taussig J, 2006, MMWR Cent. Dis. Control, 55, 421
  40. Wacquant L, 2007, Punishing the Poor: The New Government of Social Insecurity
  41. Western B, Pettit B, Guetzkow J. 2002. Black economic progress in the era of mass imprisonment. See Mauer & Chesney-Lind 2002, pp.165–80

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 301–327 of 327

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Comfort, M.
Affiliations
University of California, San Francisco (US)
Corresponding author
Comfort, Megan
ORCID
Comfort, Megan
Venue
Annual Review of Law and Social Science
Publisher
Annual Reviews
Published
2007-12-01
Volume
3
Issue
1
Pages
271-296
ISSN
  • 1550-3585 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-3631
DOI
10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.3.081806.112829
OpenAlex
W2127755023
Cited by
326
References
113
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 14
FWCI
1.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-sa
Locations
Annual Review of Law and Social Science (publishedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Justice and Penology
  • Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Law and Policy
Keywords
collateral consequences of incarceration, family networks, penal state, judicial policy, correctional policy, punitive measures

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review