The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Cellulosomes: Multienzyme Machines for Degradation of Plant Cell Wall Polysaccharides
Abstract
▪ Abstract The discrete multicomponent, multienzyme cellulosome complex of anaerobic cellulolytic bacteria provides enhanced synergistic activity among the different resident enzymes to efficiently hydrolyze intractable cellulosic and hemicellulosic substrates of the plant cell wall. A pivotal noncatalytic subunit called scaffoldin secures the various enzymatic subunits into the complex via the cohesin-dockerin interaction. The specificity characteristics and tenacious binding between the scaffoldin-based cohesin modules and the enzyme-borne dockerin domains dictate the supramolecular architecture of the cellulosome. The diversity in cellulosome architecture among the known cellulosome-producing bacteria is manifest in the arrangement of their genes in either multiple-scaffoldin or enzyme-linked clusters on the genome. The recently described three-dimensional crystal structure of the cohesin-dockerin heterodimer sheds light on the critical amino acids that contribute to this high-affinity protein-protein interaction. In addition, new information regarding the regulation of cellulosome-related genes, budding genetic tools, and emerging genomics of cellulosome-producing bacteria promises new insight into the assembly and consequences of the multienzyme complex.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Regulation of Carbon Catabolism in Bacillus Species
Stülke, J., & Hillen, W. (2000) · Annual Review of Microbiology · doi:10.1146/annurev.micro.54.1.849 · Cited by 370
Gene transfer to Clostridium cellulolyticum ATCC 35319
Jennert, K. C. B., Tardif, C., Young, D. I., & Young, M. (2000) · Microbiology · doi:10.1099/00221287-146-12-3071 · Cited by 112
Cited by
Soil enzymes in a changing environment: Current knowledge and future directions
Burns, R. G., DeForest, J. L., Marxsen, J., Sinsabaugh, R. L., Stromberger, M. E., Wallenstein, M. D., Weintraub, M. N., & Zoppini, A. (2013) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2012.11.009 · Cited by 2,552
Deconstruction of Lignocellulosic Biomass to Fuels and Chemicals
Chundawat, S. P. S., Beckham, G. T., Himmel, M. E., & Dale, B. E. (2011) · Annual Review of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering · doi:10.1146/annurev-chembioeng-061010-114205 · Cited by 1,017
Microbial cellulases and their industrial applications
Kuhad, R. C., Gupta, R., & Singh, A. (2011) · Enzyme Research · doi:10.4061/2011/280696 · Cited by 953
Payne, C. M., Knott, B. C., Mayes, H. B., Hansson, H., Himmel, M. E., Sandgren, M., Ståhlberg, J., & Beckham, G. T. (2015) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr500351c · Cited by 855
Carbohydrate Binding Modules: Biochemical Properties and Novel Applications
Shoseyov, O., Shani, Z., & Levy, I. (2006) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.00028-05 · Cited by 561
Metadata
- Authors
- Bayer, E. A., Belaich, J.-P., Shoham, Y., & Lamed, R.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Microbiology
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 2004-10-01
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 521-554
- ISSN
- 0066-4227 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-3251
- OpenAlex
- W2104494486
- Cited by
- 943
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 2.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Cellulosomes: Multienzyme Machines for Degradation of Plant Cell Wall Polysaccharides. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1146/annurev.micro.57.030502.091022
- The paper
- Bayer, E. A., Belaich, J.-P., Shoham, Y., & Lamed, R. (2004). The Cellulosomes: Multienzyme Machines for Degradation of Plant Cell Wall Polysaccharides. Annual Review of Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.micro.57.030502.091022
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.