The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Optical Methods for Monitoring Neuron Activity
Abstract
A method for monitoring neuron activity that does not require electrodes might be useful in situations where the use of electrodes is difficult because of neuron size, geometry, or number. A neuron will interact with electromagnetic or ultrasonic radiation in many different ways. If any one of these interactions changes during neuron activity, then its measurement could be used as a noninvasive method for monitoring that activity. The use of an optical method was suggested by the discovery of changes in light scattering, birefringence, and fluorescence that accompany the action potential (Co hen, Keynes & Hille 1968, Tasaki et al 1968). However, because the signal-to-noise ratios of these signals were too small to be used to monitor activity in individual neurons, a search for larger signals was initiated (Davila, Cohen & Waggoner 1 972, Cohen, 1973). At present, the largest signals are changes in absorption of light by axons stained with the merocyanine dyes (Ross et al 1977, Salzberg et al 1977), whose structures are shown in Figure 1. These absorption signals are about 100 times larger than the largest signal available in 1 971. The first part of this article presents evidence that the absorption changes of these dyes somehow result from the changes in membrane potential rather than from the ionic currents or the increases in membrane permeability that occur during an action potential. This is followed by a review of our efforts to find larger signals. The use of a dye may lead to pharmacologic effects or to photodynamic damage, and both possible problems are discussed briefly. Because the light from many different parts of a preparation can be measured simultaneously, it should, in principle, be possible to monitor activity in many neurons at once. It is this application that has inspired our interest in optical
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
VSDI: a new era in functional imaging of cortical dynamics
Grinvald, A., & Hildesheim, R. (2004) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1536 · Cited by 618
Self-citationAre central pattern generators understandable?
Selverston, A. I. (1980) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00006580 · Cited by 319
Improved fluorescent probes for the measurement of rapid changes in membrane potential
Grinvald, A., Hildesheim, R., Farber, I. C., & Anglister, L. (1982) · Biophysical Journal · doi:10.1016/s0006-3495(82)84520-7 · Cited by 258
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Cohen, L. B., Salzberg, B. M., & Grinvald, A.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 1978-03
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 171-182
- ISSN
- 0147-006X (ISSN-L)
- 1545-4126
- OpenAlex
- W2149316724
- Cited by
- 185
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 16.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Optical Methods for Monitoring Neuron Activity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1146/annurev.ne.01.030178.001131
- The paper
- Cohen, L. B., Salzberg, B. M., & Grinvald, A. (1978). Optical Methods for Monitoring Neuron Activity. Annual Review of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ne.01.030178.001131
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.