The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Molecular Control of Cell Fate in the Neural Crest: The Sympathoadrenal Lineage
Abstract
Over the past five years, new insights have been gained into the biology of the SA lineage. These advances have been powered by the development of immunologic methods to isolate embryonic SA progenitors from fetal adrenal glands and sympathetic ganglia. Analysis of these embryonic progenitors has confirmed many of the ideas derived from earlier studies of postnatal cells, but has necessitated several revisions in our thinking, as well. First, embryonic SA progenitors appear to be distinct from mature SIF cells, a cell type initially postulated to be the central intermediate in the SA lineage. Second, FGF, not NGF, appears to be an important early influence on neuronal fate; NGF responsiveness appears relatively late in differentiation. Third, the development of both sympathetic neurons and adrenal chromaffin cells is not a one-step process, but rather involves a series of events, in which the cells change their responsiveness to growth factors and glucocorticoids. Fourth, emerging circumstantial evidence suggests that SA progenitors may have additional developmental potentials. Finally, new insights have been gained into the molecular mechanisms that underlie both the differentiation of SA progenitors and their determination from earlier multipotent neural crest cells. These advances have made the SA progenitor a well-defined system for studying the molecular control of cell fate in a vertebrate neurogenic precursor cell. The analysis of the SA lineage at the cell biological level has raised several interesting molecular questions for future investigation. In the neuronal branch of the SA lineage, how is the acquisition of NGF-responsiveness and NGF-dependence controlled, and what is the relationship of these events to the expression of p140trk and p75? In the chromaffin branch of the pathway, which molecules control the timing of PNMT expression? In the uncommitted SA progenitor, what is the molecular basis of the antagonism between the competing neuronal and chromaffin pathways of differentiation, and how does commitment to neuronal differentiation occur? Can SA progenitors differentiate to enteric neurons in vitro, and which differentiation and survival factors control this phenotype, as well as the other classical neurotransmitter and neuropeptide phenotypes expressed by SA derivatives? What are the roles of MASH1 and other regulatory genes in controlling early stages in neural crest cell determination, and how is the expression of these molecules in turn controlled? How much of the genetic regulatory network controlling neuronal differentiation in Drosophila has been conserved in vertebrates?(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gene regulation by steroid hormones
Beato, M. (1989) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(89)90237-7 · Cited by 3,383
The trk Proto-Oncogene Product: a Signal Transducing Receptor for Nerve Growth Factor
Kaplan, D. R., Hempstead, B. L., Martin-Zanca, D., Chao, M. V., & Parada, L. F. (1991) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1850549 · Cited by 1,379
Gene transfer and molecular cloning of the rat nerve growth factor receptor
Radeke, M. J., Misko, T. P., Hsu, C., Herzenberg, L. A., & Shooter, E. M. (1987) · Nature · doi:10.1038/325593a0 · Cited by 938
Szabo, A., Dalmau, J., Manley, G., Rosenfeld, M., Wong, E., Henson, J., Posner, J. B., & Furneaux, H. M. (1991) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(91)90184-z · Cited by 553
Cited by
Luo, X., Ikeda, Y., & Parker, K. L. (1994) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(94)90211-9 · Cited by 1,631
Cole, T. J., Blendy, J. A., Monaghan, A. P., Krieglstein, K., Schmid, W., Aguzzi, A., Fantuzzi, G., Hummler, E., Unsicker, K., & Schütz, G. (1995) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.9.13.1608 · Cited by 946
Peripheral Chemoreceptors: Function and Plasticity of the Carotid Body
Kumar, P., & Prabhakar, N. R. (2012) · Comprehensive Physiology · doi:10.1002/cphy.c100069 · Cited by 530
Morrison, S. J., Csete, M., Groves, A. K., Melega, W., Wold, B., & Anderson, D. J. (2000) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.20-19-07370.2000 · Cited by 403
Self-citationKim, A. C., Reuter, A. L., Zubair, M., Else, T., Serecky, K., Bingham, N. C., Lavery, G. G., Parker, K. L., & Hammer, G. D. (2008) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.021493 · Cited by 202
Metadata
- Authors
- Anderson, D. J.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 1993-03
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 129-158
- ISSN
- 0147-006X (ISSN-L)
- 1545-4126
- OpenAlex
- W2106809514
- Cited by
- 226
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 6.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Molecular Control of Cell Fate in the Neural Crest: The Sympathoadrenal Lineage. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1146/annurev.ne.16.030193.001021
- The paper
- Anderson, D. J. (1993). Molecular Control of Cell Fate in the Neural Crest: The Sympathoadrenal Lineage. Annual Review of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ne.16.030193.001021
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.