The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Contextual Influences on Visual Processing
Abstract
▪ Abstract The visual image formed on the retina represents an amalgam of visual scene properties, including the reflectances of surfaces, their relative positions, and the type of illumination. The challenge facing the visual system is to extract the “meaning” of the image by decomposing it into its environmental causes. For each local region of the image, that extraction of meaning is only possible if information from other regions is taken into account. Of particular importance is a set of image cues revealing surface occlusion and/or lighting conditions. These information-rich cues direct the perceptual interpretation of other more ambiguous image regions. This context-dependent transformation from image to perception has profound—but frequently under-appreciated—implications for neurophysiological studies of visual processing: To demonstrate that neuronal responses are correlated with perception of visual scene properties, rather than visual image features, neuronal sensitivity must be assessed in varied contexts that differentially influence perceptual interpretation. We review a number of recent studies that have used this context-based approach to explore the neuronal bases of visual scene perception.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Solving the “real” mysteries of visual perception: The world as an outside memory
O'Regan, J. K. (1992) · Canadian Journal of Psychology / Revue canadienne de psychologie · doi:10.1037/h0084327 · Cited by 997
The neurophysiology of figure-ground segregation in primary visual cortex
Lamme, V. (1995) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.15-02-01605.1995 · Cited by 946
Perceptual filling in of artificially induced scotomas in human vision
Ramachandran, V. S., & Gregory, R. L. (1991) · Nature · doi:10.1038/350699a0 · Cited by 503
Cited by
Object perception as Bayesian inference
Kersten, D., Mamassian, P., & Yuille, A. (2004) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.142005 · Cited by 1,269
Cortex and memory: emergence of a new paradigm
Fuster, J. M. (2009) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.2009.21280 · Cited by 559
How neuroscience will change our view on consciousness
Lamme, V. A. F. (2010) · Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/17588921003731586 · Cited by 487
Rapid Neocortical Dynamics: Cellular and Network Mechanisms
Haider, B., & McCormick, D. A. (2009) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2009.04.008 · Cited by 441
A Primer on Pattern-Based Approaches to fMRI: Principles, Pitfalls, and Perspectives
Haynes, J.-D. (2015) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2015.05.025 · Cited by 402
Metadata
- Authors
- Albright, T. D., & Stoner, G. R.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 2002-03
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 339-379
- ISSN
- 0147-006X (ISSN-L)
- 1545-4126
- OpenAlex
- W2138558323
- Cited by
- 347
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 0.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Contextual Influences on Visual Processing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1146/annurev.neuro.25.112701.142900
- The paper
- Albright, T. D., & Stoner, G. R. (2002). Contextual Influences on Visual Processing. Annual Review of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.neuro.25.112701.142900
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.