The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
DMSA and DMPS-Water Soluble Antidotes for Heavy Metal Poisoning
Abstract
This article reviews the pharmacological properties and the uses of two important antidotes for heavy metal poisoning. Meso-dimercaptosuccinic acid (DMSA) and 2,3-dimercapto-l-propanesulfonic acid, Na salt (DMPS) are relatively new antidotes-new, that is, to the western world. Although DMSA was introduced originally by Friedheim et al (1) to increase uptake of antimony during schistosomiasis therapy, Liang et al (77) at Shanghai in 1957 were the first to report its effectiveness as an antidote for heavy metal poisoning. The synthesis and some of the metal binding properties of DMPS were reported in 1956 by Petrunkin from Kiev (3). Shortly thereaf ter, DMPS became an official drug in the Soviet Union, where it is known as Unithiol (4). Between 1956 and 1975, DMSA and DMPS were studied extensively, at both the basic science and clinical levels, in the People's Republic of China, the Soviet Union, and Japan. Some of these investigations have been cited and can be found in an earlier review (5). In the USA and western Europe, however, these two compounds received very little attention until recently. A paper by Friedheim & Corvi (6) in 1975, dealing with DMSA for the treatment of mercury poisoning, and the recent production and availability of DMPS from Heyl & Co., Berlin, stimulated investigators to rediscover and study these two metal-binding agents. DMSA and DMPS are water soluble chemical analogs of dimercaprol (British Anti-Lewisite, BAL). In contrast to BAL, they have less toxicity, greater water solubility, and lim ited lipid solubility, and are effective when given orally.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Clarkson, T. W., Magos, L., Cox, C., et al. (1981) · Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics · doi:10.1016/s0022-3565(25)32633-9 · Cited by 126
Aposhian, H. V. (1981) · Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/0041-008x(81)90360-4 · Cited by 66
Self-citationAposhian, H. V., Mershon, M. M., Brinkley, F. B., Hsu, C.-A., & Hackley, B. E. (1982) · Life Sciences · doi:10.1016/0024-3205(82)90108-4 · Cited by 49
Self-citationThe relative effectiveness of some chelating agents as antidotes in acute cadmium poisoning.
Mm, J., Ad, W., & Weller, W. L. (1978) · PubMed · Cited by 33
Cited by
Mercury Toxicity and Treatment: A Review of the Literature
Bernhoft, R. A. (2012) · Journal of Environmental and Public Health · doi:10.1155/2012/460508 · Cited by 1,162
ENZYMATIC METHYLATION OF ARSENIC SPECIES AND OTHER NEW APPROACHES TO ARSENIC TOXICITY
Aposhian, H. V. (1997) · Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology · doi:10.1146/annurev.pharmtox.37.1.397 · Cited by 426
Self-citationMandal, B. K., Ogra, Y., & Suzuki, K. T. (2001) · Chemical Research in Toxicology · doi:10.1021/tx000246h · Cited by 349
Visschers, R. G. J., Luyer, M. D., Schaap, F. G., Olde Damink, S. W. M., & Soeters, P. B. (2013) · Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition and Metabolic Care · doi:10.1097/mco.0b013e32836410a4 · Cited by 60
Metadata
- Authors
- Aposhian, H. V.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 1983-04
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 193-215
- ISSN
- 0362-1642 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-4304
- OpenAlex
- W2174484416
- Cited by
- 316
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 11.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: DMSA and DMPS-Water Soluble Antidotes for Heavy Metal Poisoning. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1146/annurev.pa.23.040183.001205
- The paper
- Aposhian, H. V. (1983). DMSA and DMPS-Water Soluble Antidotes for Heavy Metal Poisoning. Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.pa.23.040183.001205
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.