Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 583

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Molecular Mechanism of β-Arrestin-Biased Agonism at Seven-Transmembrane Receptors

Open access
Reiter, Eric, Ahn, Seungkirl, Shukla, Arun K., Lefkowitz, Robert J.·2012·Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology

Abstract

The concept of biased agonism has recently come to the fore with the realization that seven-transmembrane receptors (7TMRs, also known as G protein–coupled receptors, or GPCRs) activate complex signaling networks and can adopt multiple active conformations upon agonist binding. As a consequence, the “efficacy” of receptors, which was classically considered linear, is now recognized as pluridimensional. Biased agonists selectively stabilize only a subset of receptor conformations induced by the natural “unbiased” ligand, thus preferentially activating certain signaling mechanisms. Such agonists thus reveal the intriguing possibility that one can direct cellular signaling with unprecedented precision and specificity and support the notion that biased agonists may identify new classes of therapeutic agents that have fewer side effects. This review focuses on one particular class of biased ligands that has the ability to alter the balance between G protein–dependent and β-arrestin-dependent signal transduction.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev.pharmtox.010909.105800

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 583

Metadata

Authors
Reiter, E., Ahn, S., Shukla, A. K., & Lefkowitz, R. J.
Venue
Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology
Published
2012-02-10
Volume
52
Issue
1
Pages
179-197
ISSN
  • 0362-1642 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-4304
OpenAlex
W2111373319
Cited by
583
References
1
FWCI
3.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.