Cited by 247Ubiquitin and proteasome pathwaysProtein Degradation and InhibitorsProtease and Inhibitor Mechanisms

THE PROTEASOME AND PROTEASOME INHIBITORS IN CANCER THERAPY

Voorhees, Peter M., Orlowski, Robert Z.·2006·Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology

Abstract

▪ Abstract The proteasome, a multicatalytic proteinase complex, is responsible for the majority of intracellular protein degradation. Pharmacologic inhibitors of the proteasome possess in vitro and in vivo antitumor activity, and bortezomib, the first such agent to undergo clinical testing, has significant efficacy against multiple myeloma and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). Preclinical studies demonstrate that proteasome inhibition potentiates the activity of other cancer therapeutics, in part by downregulating chemoresistance pathways. Early clinical studies of bortezomib-based combinations, showing encouraging activity, support this observation. Molecular characterization of resistance to proteasome inhibitors has revealed novel therapeutic targets for sensitizing malignancies to these agents, such as the heat shock pathway. Below, we review the pharmacologic, preclinical, and clinical data that have paved the way for the use of proteasome inhibitors for cancer therapy; outline strategies aimed at enhancing the efficacy of proteasome inhibitors; and review other potential targets in the ubiquitin proteasome pathway for the treatment of cancer.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev.pharmtox.46.120604.141300

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Voorhees, P. M., & Orlowski, R. Z.
Affiliations
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Venue
Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology
Published
2006-02-01
Volume
46
Issue
1
Pages
189-213
ISSN
  • 0362-1642 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-4304
OpenAlex
W2118559527
Cited by
247
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 16
FWCI
2.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Cancer Institute (P30CA 16086, R01CA102278, P30CA016086)
  • National Center for Research Resources (RR00046, M01RR000046)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Degradation and Inhibitors
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Protease and Inhibitor Mechanisms
Keywords
proteasome, proteasome inhibitors, bortezomib, multiple myeloma, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, chemoresistance, drug combination therapy, ubiquitin-proteasome system, protein degradation, cancer therapy
MeSH terms
Bortezomib, Animals, Antineoplastic Agents, Boronic Acids, Cell Transformation, Neoplastic, Humans, Neoplasms, Pyrazines, Drug Resistance, Neoplasm, Proteasome Endopeptidase Complex, Proteasome Inhibitors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review