The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Interactions Of Deleterious And Beneficial Rhizosphere Microorganisms And The Effect Of Cropping Practices
Abstract
Evidence is increasing that the saprophytic microflora of the rhizosphere includes both deleterious and beneficial elements that have the potential to influence plant growth and crop yields significantly (13, 16, 25, 27, 57, 72, 77, 78). The deleterious microorganisms affect plant growth negatively, but they do not necessarily parasitize the plant tissue. Their deleterious activities include alterations of the supply of water, ions, and plant growth substances by changing root functions and/or by limiting root growth (1,57, 67, 77). The mechanisms by which beneficial nonsymbiotic microorganisms are considered to affect plant growth positively include promotion of the availability and uptake of mineral nutrients (6, 7, 27), provision of plant-growth substances (27, 56, 57), and, most of all, suppression of deleterious rhizosphere microorganisms (13, 27, 28, 72, 77). Beneficial rhizobacteria that promote plant growth, supposedly by competing for iron with deleterious rhizosphere microorganisms, have recently become known as plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) (13, 41, 67, 77). This paper reviews recent knowledge on deleterious and beneficial rhizosphere bacteria, their interactions, and their effect on yield as related to cropping practices.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Plant Growth-Promoting Bacteria: Mechanisms and Applications
Glick, B. R. (2012) · Scientifica · doi:10.6064/2012/963401 · Cited by 3,346
Hardoim, P. R., van Overbeek, L. S., Berg, G., Pirttilä, A. M., Compant, S., Campisano, A., Döring, M., & Sessitsch, A. (2015) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.00050-14 · Cited by 2,708
SYSTEMIC RESISTANCE INDUCED BY RHIZOSPHERE BACTERIA
van Loon, L. C., Bakker, P. A. H. M., & Pieterse, C. M. J. (1998) · Annual Review of Phytopathology · doi:10.1146/annurev.phyto.36.1.453 · Cited by 2,361
Soil beneficial bacteria and their role in plant growth promotion: a review
Hayat, R., Ali, S., Amara, U., Khalid, R., & Ahmed, I. (2010) · Annals of Microbiology · doi:10.1007/s13213-010-0117-1 · Cited by 2,064
Biological Control of Soilborne Plant Pathogens in the Rhizosphere with Bacteria
Weller, D. M. (1988) · Annual Review of Phytopathology · doi:10.1146/annurev.py.26.090188.002115 · Cited by 1,763
Metadata
- Authors
- Schippers, B.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Phytopathology
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 1987-01-01
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 339-358
- ISSN
- 0066-4286 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2171374845
- Cited by
- 711
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 23.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Interactions Of Deleterious And Beneficial Rhizosphere Microorganisms And The Effect Of Cropping Practices. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1146/annurev.phyto.25.1.339
- The paper
- Schippers, B. (1987). Interactions Of Deleterious And Beneficial Rhizosphere Microorganisms And The Effect Of Cropping Practices. Annual Review of Phytopathology. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.phyto.25.1.339
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.